Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

Dr. Ikram Ullah vs KPK Agricultural University Peshawar

Citation: PLJ 2015 Peshawar 237, 2017 PLC CS 615

Case No: WP.No.1012/2014

Judgment Date: 04/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: Definition of experience,constitutional jurisdiction cannot substitute opinion of the selection board

Amir Taimoor etc vs Govt. of KPK etc

Citation: 2015 CLC 1824, PLJ 2015 Peshawar 317, 2016 PLC CS 106,PLJ 2016 Peshawar 120

Case No: WP.No.3398,3556,2242 & 1833-P/2014

Judgment Date: 04/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: Chapter-3,paragraph 3(6)Land Record Manual:Criteria for appointment of Patwaries

Jamal Khan V. Secretary Home Department and 6 others,

Citation: 2015 MLD 972

Case No: Constitutional Petition No.631 of 2014

Judgment Date: 04/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Balochistan High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Ejaz Swati

Summary: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-------S.22-A---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.419, 420, 467, 468 & 471---Arbitration Act (X of1940), Ss. 30 & 33---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Maintainability---Cheating and forgery---Justice of peace---FIR, registration of---Scope---Contention of the petitioner was that respondents by preparing a forged arbitration agreementhad committed an offence under Ss. 419, 420, 467, 468 & 471, P.P.C.---Application forregistration of FIR was dismissed by the Justice of Peace/Sessions Judge---Validity---Civildispute between the parties with regard to partition of Shamilat property was on record---Petitioner had turned a civil dispute into criminal proceedings just to continue his possessionover a piece of land---If a property dispute in arbitration agreement or award on any ground hadbeen raised then a specific remedy under Ss. 30 & 33 of Arbitration Act, 1940 was available tothe petitioner---Dispute with regard to property had been referred to the arbitrators---None of thepersons except petitioner after 13 years of execution, initiated proceedings for the registration ofFIR against respondents---Averments made by the petitioner had not been supported by otherexecutant of such arbitration agreement/award---Petitioner had an alternate and efficacious remedy to seek grievance before the competent court of law---Constitutional petition was notmaintainable which was dismissed, in circumstances.PLD 2007 SC 539 and 2003 YLR 1941 ref.

Zulikha Bibi V. Election Commission of Pakistan through Secretary and another,

Citation: 2015 YLR 1584

Case No: C.P. No.353 of 2014

Judgment Date: 04/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Balochistan High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Ejaz Swati

Summary: (a) Balochistan Local Government Act (V of 2010)-------S. 24---Balochistan Zakat and Ushr Act (I of 2012), S. 23---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Local bodies elections---Qualification for candidates and electedmembers---Chairman District Zakat Committee---Public servant---Writ of quo warranto---Scope---Laches, principle of---Applicability---Contention of petitioner was that respondent beinggovernment contractor as well as Chairman of Local Zakat Committee was not eligible to contestlocal bodies election---Respondent contended that he had resigned from the post of ChairmanDistrict Zakat Committee---Validity---Nothing was on record that petitioner had any mala fideon his part or he was exploiting the process for personal gain---Principle of laches did not applyto writ of quo warranto as the cause of action was a recurring one---Chairman District ZakatCommittee being public servant would be barred from contesting the local bodies election---Respondent being Chairman of Local Zakat Committee was disqualified from being elected orchosen as a member of Municipal Committee---Notification of respondent as member ofMunicipal Committee was set aside and Election Commission was directed to delete his name from the list of validly returned candidates for Municipal Committee---Constitutional petitionwas accepted in circumstances.Muhammad Yasin v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division,Islamabad and others PLD 2012 SC 132; PLD 2010 Lah. 625; 2010 PLC (C.S) 731; 2002 PLC(C.S) 274; Malik Umar Aslam v. Mrs. Sumaira Malik and others 2014 SCMR 45; MuhammadKhan v. Amanullah PLD 2014 Bal. 128 and Mirza Muhammad Tufail v. District ReturningOfficer PLD 2007 SC 16 rel.(b) Balochistan Zakat and Ushr Act (I of 2012)-------S. 23---Chairman of District Zakat Committee---Status---Chairman District Zakat Committeebeing nominated by the Government in consultation with the Provincial Council would bedeemed to be a public servant.(c) Constitution of Pakistan-------Art. 199---Writ of quo-warranto---Laches, principle of---Applicability---Principle of lachesdid not apply to writ of quo-warranto, cause of action being recurring one.

Taimoor Khan v. The State

Citation: 2016 SCMR 621, 2016 SCP 40

Case No: Crl.A.163/2013

Judgment Date: 04/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN

Summary: ---Issue:The primary issue was the admissibility and reliability of the Chemical Examiner's report in determining the narcotic nature of the seized substance and the legal definition of narcotics, specifically opium and its derivatives, under the relevant

Residenceof Chaqpo Versus Muaza Saidershigar

Citation: Pending

Case No: No. 07/2015

Judgment Date: 04/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Supreme Appellate Court - GB

Judge: Justice

Summary: Summary Pending

Secretary Works Gilgit Baltistan

Citation: Pending

Case No: No. 102/2015

Judgment Date: 04/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Supreme Appellate Court - GB

Judge: Justice

Summary: Summary Pending

SHAHID AKHTAR vs KHALIDA PARVEEN and others

Citation: 2019 CLD 520

Case No: E.F.A. No. 188/2014

Judgment Date: 03/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Shams Mehmood Mirza and Jawad Hassan, JJ

Summary: Summary pending

ALLAH YAR and 2 otherss vs The STATE and another

Citation: 2017 YLR 204

Case No: Crl. Misc. No.2712-B/2014

Judgment Date: 03/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Shahid Hameed Dar, J

Summary: Summary pending

The LOUIS BERGER GROUP and otherss vs LTH JOINT VENTURE and others

Citation: 2020 CLC 493

Case No: C.R. No.293/2014

Judgment Date: 03/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Mirza Viqas Rauf, J

Summary: Summary pending

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.05.2a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top