Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
Haji Rabnawaz Vs Chief Engineer PESCO etc
Summary: S. 54-C of Electricity Act, 1910 creates a bar for issuance of prohibitory order from disconnecting the Supply without first asking consumer to deposit the outstanding amount within thirty days.
Mst. Hameeda Bibi Vs Public at Large etc
Summary: Custody of Minor... Right of Hizanat with respect of male child.
MOHAMMAD ANWAR RAMAY and 2 others vs NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through President/Chief Executive and another
Summary: Summary pending
The DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATIONFBR vs Messrs CUSTOMS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCHII KARACHI and another
Summary: Summary pending
SAHIBZADA FAISAL ALI KHAN VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Summary: Summary pending.
IQBAL HUSSAIN VS GENERAL MANAGER SOUTHERN TELECOM REGION II
Summary: Summary pending.
SYED MOHAMMAD ALI RAZA ZAIDI VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
Mishal Khan Vs The State
Summary: S. 9 (c) CNSA, 1997.Appeal against acquittal--- Benefit of doubt--- Benefit of doubt should be extended to accused.
M/s Gul Construction (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & others V/S Province of Sindh & others (Defendant)
Summary: Public Procurement matters (Public Notice/Bidding process)---Rule 31,37, 39, 42 and 43 of Sindh Public Procurement Rules (SPPR) 2010, Section 37 AND 282-A of State Bank of Pakistan Act 1956 relating to Scheduled Bank and Non- Banking Financial Company (NBFC) and provision of Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of CPC.
SAHIBZADA FAISAL ALI KHAN VS FOP ETC.
Summary: This document pertains to a writ petition in Pakistan where the petitioner challenges the inclusion of their name in the Credit Information Bureau (CIB) maintained by the State Bank of Pakistan as a defaulter. The petitioner had obtained a loan to purchase buses but faced repayment issues, leading to a lawsuit. Despite being allowed to defend the lawsuit, the petitioner's name was added to the CIB. The petitioner argued that the State Bank of Pakistan lacked the authority to impose penalties related to borrower conduct. The State Bank of Pakistan defends its actions, asserting its role in collecting credit information to aid financial institutions in making lending decisions. The document provided a detailed legal analysis of the case, referencing relevant regulations and court judgments. Ultimately, the court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the inclusion of the petitioner's name in the CIB.