Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
MUHAMMAD SHAKIR KHAN vs Mst SANAM SIDDIQUE and others
Summary: Summary pending
NAHIDA JABEEN vs AGHA MUHAMMAD and 6 others
Summary: Summary pending
Rana Muhammad Hassan VS Chief Commissioner ICT Islamabad etc
Summary: Intra Court Appeal in WP 263 -20 (Election Matter: Seeks direction against respondent to declare election of SLIECHS illega.)
Syed Abid Hussain VS General Manger (HR and A), Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited and others.
Summary: Civil Revision Petition against the Judgement and decree order dated: 24.02.2014 passed by Additional District and Session Judge- VI- West, Islamabad.
Collector of Sales Tax & Federal Excise, peshawar VS M/s Flying Kraft Paper Mills, Pvt, Ltd
Summary: Residential colony located within premises of manufacturing unit---Question before High Court was whether taxpayer which was a manufacturing unit, could claim input tax adjustment on payment of utility (Gas and Electricity) bills consumed in its labour residential colony
Malik Wajid Vs The State
Summary: The case of the Mst. Faiza Bibi is that she being sui juris has contracted marriage with petitioner Malik Wajid with her free consent and that nobody had abducted her. she has placed the registered Nikahnama on the file. Section 251 of Mahomedan Law says that Every Mahomedan of sound mind, who has attained puberty, may enter into a contract of marriage.
(Motion) Rashid Khan Vs Mst Momna
Summary: It is pertinent to note here that proceedings under section 491 and 491-A Cr.P.C are summary in nature and not intended to go beyond the summary consideration of the questions essentially relevant to the alleged detention. Court while deciding application is not required to go into the question of status or relationship of the parties by holding full-fledged trial of the counterclaim and it should concern itself only with the free will of the detenue.Jurisdiction of High Court under section 491 Cr. P.C for recovery of minors is to be exercised sparingly and such exercise may be undertaken only in exceptional and extraordinary cases of real urgency keeping in view that even a Guardian Judge has the requisite powers of recovery of minors andregulating interim custody.
M/s. Idara-e-Noor-e-Haq through Sec. (Appellant) V/S Public at Large (Respondent)
Summary: Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925)-------Ss. 272, 269, 299, 300 & 384---Appeal---Probate, grant of---Ownerless property---Application for grant of probate under S.272 Succession Act, 1925, was filed by appellant but Trial Court dismissed the application---Validity---Once it was found that none was available to claim ownership of immovable property in question in his own right or by way of inheritance, such property should be treated as an ownerless property---Once Court was satisfied that the property was rendered ownerless, it was the duty of Court to protect it from being misappropriated or wasted or damaged---Court could appoint Curator under S.195 of Succession Act, 1925, to takeover possession of the property pending final determination of fate of proceedings---Court could have also taken prompt action under S.269 of Succession Act, 1925, for protection of such property---Jurisdiction of High Court under S.300 of Succession Act, 1925, was concurrent with District Judge in exercise of power under Succession Act, 1925---High Court appointed its official as a Curator to protect the property in question and directed him to take over the possession immediately---High Court declined to interfere in the order passed by Trial Court---Appeal was dismissed in circumstances. 1993 CLC 1552 ref.
Muhammad Ayaz Shamas Vs The State etc
Summary: Bail denied --- The document pertains to a bail application under Section 497 Cr.P.C., where the petitioner seeks relief from arrest for an offense under Section 377 PPC. The petitioner was accused of committing an unnatural offense with the complainant's 10-year-old son. The petitioner's counsel argued innocence, citing false implication and lack of supporting evidence. The prosecution counters, emphasizing the credibility of eyewitnesses and medical evidence. The court dismissed the bail application, noting the occurrence's sensitivity. Additionally, the document highlighted the importance of DNA evidence in sexual assault cases and addresses lapses in evidence collection procedures, directing authorities to adhere to guidelines for better forensic practices.