Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE VS RETURNING OFFICER

Citation: 2005 CLC 617

Case No: ELECTION APPEAL No. 35/2002

Judgment Date: 10-09-2002

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Moosa K Leghari

Summary: Summary pending.

MESSRS EFU GENERAL INSURANCE LIMTED KARACHI VS MESSRS NINA INDUSTRIES LIMITED KARACHI

Citation: 2005 CLC 1104

Case No: SUIT No. 641/2011

Judgment Date: 31-01-2015

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice Syed Saeeduddin Nasir

Summary: Summary pending.

SARDAR MUHAMMAD JAHANGIR VS JUDGE FAMILY COURT

Citation: 2005 CLC 990

Case No: WP No. 3049/2014

Judgment Date: 03-02-2015

Jurisdiction: Islamabad High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Anwar Khan Kasi

Summary: (a) West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964) ----S. 7(2), Proviso---Additional evidence at a belated stage---Discretion of Family Court---Petitioner filed an application to submit additional documents regarding maintenance payments during proceedings for recovery of past maintenance and enhancement filed by respondents---Family Court rejected the application on the ground that the Act does not allow admission of evidence not appended with the written statement---Held, the proviso to S. 7(2) of the Family Courts Act empowers the court to allow additional evidence at any stage if deemed expedient in the interest of justice---Discretion under this proviso applies equally to both plaintiffs and defendants. (b) Constitutional Jurisdiction ----Art. 199---Writ of certiorari---Interference in interlocutory orders---High Court may examine interlocutory orders in constitutional jurisdiction when no alternate remedy is available, particularly where such orders affect the substantive outcome of proceedings or render them futile. (c) Relevance of Additional Evidence ----Assessment of relevance---Family Court failed to assess the relevance of the additional evidence sought to be submitted by the petitioner and instead dismissed the application solely on procedural grounds---Held, dismissal without considering the relevance of the evidence to the matter in controversy constitutes an error. (d) Fair Trial ----Opportunity to produce relevant evidence---The denial of the opportunity to present additional evidence without proper consideration of its relevance undermines the right to a fair trial---Courts are required to balance procedural rules with substantive justice to ensure equitable adjudication. Disposition: Petition allowed; impugned order dated 21-5-2014 set aside; matter remanded to the Family Court for a fresh decision on the application for additional evidence after giving both parties an opportunity to be heard.

MUHAMMAD RASHID VS MUHAMMAD JAVAID BUTT

Citation: 2005 CLC 1153

Case No: WP No. 6716/2004

Judgment Date: 21-05-2004

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Mian Hamid Farooq

Summary: Summary pending.

MUHAMMAD SHARIF CHATTER VS COMMISSIONER REHABILITATION AZAD JAMMU KASHMIR GOVERNMENT CAMP MIRPUR

Citation: 2005 CLC 457

Case No: CIVIL APPEAL No. 21/2004

Judgment Date: 03-12-2004

Jurisdiction: AJK Supreme Court

Judge: Justice Kh Imtiaz Ahmadaaja Muhammad Saeed

Summary: Summary pending.

MST KHURSHID BIBI OTHERSS VS WRAMZAN

Citation: 2005 CLC 1714

Case No: CR No. 442/1995

Judgment Date: 25-05-2005

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Maulvi Anwarul Haq

Summary: Summary pending.

MASOOD AKHTARIN VS MANZOOR AHMAD

Citation: 2005 CLC 1651

Case No: CR Nos. 558-D AND 559-D/2004

Judgment Date: 09-03-2005

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry

Summary: Summary pending.

AZIZ UR REHMAN VS PRESIDING OFFICER LOCAL COUNCIL ELECTIONS

Citation: 2005 CLC 1201

Case No: CIVIL APPEAL NB. 43/1992

Judgment Date: 20-02-1993

Jurisdiction: AJK Supreme Court

Judge: Justice Sardar Muhammad Ashrqf Khanl

Summary: Summary pending.

JAVED RIAZ VS LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL

Citation: 2005 CLC 1128

Case No: WP No. 6705/2005

Judgment Date: 27-04-2005

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Ch

Summary: Summary pending.

SYED GHAZI GULAB JAMAL VS PRESIDING OFFICER ELECTION TRIBUNAL PESHAWAR

Citation: 2005 CLC 953

Case No: WPS Nos. 2032-P 2846-P 3369-P/2013 AND 28-P/2014

Judgment Date: 06-03-2014

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice Mazhar A Lam Khan Miankhel

Summary: Summary pending.

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.03.1a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top