Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
BANK OF PUNJAB through its Principal Officer/Constituted Attorney VS SIKANDAR HAYAT KHAN and 3 other
Summary: Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)--
----O. XX, R. 11--Financial Institution (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, S. 22--Suit for
recovery before Banking Court--Repayment of decretal amount in installments--Banking Court
could not order for payment of decretal amount in installments without consent of bank--No
sufficient reasons--Once sufficient mortgaged property was available with bank to
recover decretal amount in lump sum, no justification to pass order for making payment
of decretal amount in installments--Banking Court had the option either to refuse the passing of
the consenting decree as there was no agreement between the parties on mode of payment or
Banking Court could itself after giving hearing to the parties on the issue and by giving sufficient
reasons could make order for payment of decretal amount in installments--Installments could not
be made by Banking Court without giving sufficient reasons, especially where the decree was a
consenting decree and the claimed suit amount was already reduced by the Bank--Impugned
judgment and decree passed by Banking Court to the extent of repayment of decretal amount in
installments was not sustainable and same was set aside.
Dr.Riaz Khan vs Abdur Rasheed
Summary: S.5,14 Limitation Act:Suit for compensation--Exclusion of time of proceedings in court without jurisdiction--Scope
Govt of KPK vs Muhammad Anwar Khan
Summary: O.IX,R-13,O.XXVII,R-1,O.I,R-10,S.79 CPC,S.8 SRA,Art.164,181 Limitation Act:Suit for possession of immovable property in possession of govt--Ex parte decree,setting aside of--Limitation
Mian Zia-ur-Rehman VS Syed Ahmad Hussain Shah
Summary: S.54, 55, & 63 Representation of the People Act, 1976.Art: 199 of Constitution of Pakistan--Maintainability of writ petition--Procedure before Election Commission & Tribunal--appellate authority.
Orya Maqbool Abbasi v. Federation of Pakistan and others
Summary: The Central Selection Board (CSB), being a semi judicial forum, has been authorized to examine the cases of the officers justly and fairly. Notification of promotion of all the officers from BS-20 to 21 issued in pursuance of the recommendations of CSB is set aside with the direction to the competent authority to undertake the process of the promotion to all of them strictly in accordance with law on merits under section 9 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973, read with rules 7, 7A and 8 of the Civil Servants (Appointments, Promotions and Transfers) Rules, 1973 as well as Promotion Policy as amended up to date. The Government shall also undertake exercise to outline the objective criteria for promotion to make the civil servant an honest officer and free from political pressure.
SAEED ULLAH PARACHA VS HABIB BANK LIMITED
Summary: Summary pending.
ASIF YOUSAF VS SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISIONCBR ISLAMABAD
Summary: Summary pending.
MST HAFEEZ BEGUM THROUGH ATTORNEY VS MRS ZAINAB MUHAMMAD ALI
Summary: Summary pending.
ASIM SHAHZAD VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
MEHBOOB ALIAS BOOBA VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.