Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
RASHID VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
MESSRS MEEZAN BANK LIMITED VS MRS PARVEEN SABIR
Summary: Summary pending.
Saifullah Khan Vs Anwar Khan and six others
Summary: S.43 Punjab Minor Canal Act,1905 Jurisdiction of Revenue officer to try the suit v/s 43 of Act ibid.
NAVEEDA ABBAS VS ASJ ETC
Summary: The facts of the case involved the custody of a minor child, who was allegedly taken away and kept under illegal custody by the respondent who is the real brother of the appellant. The appellant initially filed a habeas corpus petition under section 491 Cr.P.C before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gujranwala, seeking the recovery of her daughter's custody. The Lahore High Court, while considering the appeal, concluded that the instant appeal was not maintainable under section 3(2) of the Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972, as an appeal does not lie against an order made under Article 199(1)(b)(i) of the Constitution. The court also found that there were no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances to warrant exercising jurisdiction under Article 199 or Section 491 Cr.P.C. The Intra Court appeal was dismissed.
AAMIR IQBAL KHAN VS MARIA NARGIS ETC.
Summary: In Writ Petition, Amir Iqbal Khan filed a petition challenging the judgments and decrees of the lower courts in a family court suit filed by Maria Nargis for the recovery of maintenance amount and dowry articles. The family court had decreed in favor of Maria Nargis, ordering the petitioner to pay maintenance allowance at Rs. 3,000/- per month and to return dowry articles as per list Ex.P-2. The petitioner and respondent both appealed the family court's decision. The Additional District Judge accepted the appeal of Maria Nargis with a slight modification regarding dowry articles and the addition of jewelry given as bridal gifts, while dismissing the petitioner's appeal. After hearing the arguments of both parties and reviewing the record, the High Court upheld the judgments of the lower courts, stating that the judgment of the appellate court was in accordance with the law, justice, and equity. The writ petition was dismissed.
AMAN ULLAH ETC VS FOP ETC
Summary: In Writ Petition, Aman Ullah and others sought to set aside their termination orders and receive the enhanced salaries approved by the Cabinet Sub Committee. The petitioners were appointed as Feeder Teachers by the Government of Pakistan to improve basic education under the National Education Fund Ordinance, 2008. The Cabinet Sub Committee had decided to regularize the services of Feeder Teachers and enhance their honorarium from Rs. 2,500/- to Rs. 8,000/- per month. The court observed that the termination was not supported by the Cabinet Sub Committee's decision and was discriminatory in nature. It noted that Article 25-A of the Constitution guarantees compulsory education to all children aged 5 to 16 years, and the Feeder Teachers play a significant role in providing this right. The court allowed the petition, set aside the termination orders, and directed the respondents to reinstate the petitioners as Feeder Teachers and pay them the enhanced honorarium from Rs. 2,500/- to Rs. 8,000/- per month.
SYED MUKARAM SHAH VS FAZAL QADOOS
Summary: Summary pending.
MRAN KHAN VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF INTERIOR
Summary: Summary pending.
MST ROSHAN ARA BEGUM OTHERSS VS MUHAMMAD BANARAS
Summary: Summary pending.
NAWAZISH ALI OTHERSS VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.