Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
BINYAMEEN KHALIL VS RIAZ AHMED RAHI
Summary: Summary pending.
ORYA MAQBOOL ABBASI VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY ESTABLISHMENT
Summary: Summary pending.
HAJI MIAN KHAN DM M VS MGOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWATHROUGH COLLECTOR DISTRICT DI KHAN
Summary: Summary pending.
GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA S VS MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN RESPONDE
Summary: Summary pending.
MUHAMMAD RASHEED S VS GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY LOCAL GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT
Summary: Summary pending.
ORYA MAQBOOL ABBASI VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY ESTABLISHMENT
Summary: Summary pending.
DR RIAZ KHAN VS ABDUR RASHEED
Summary: Summary pending.
MST ZAHIDA PARVEEN VS MUHAMMAD AFZAL ASI THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
BANK OF PUNJAB through its Principal Officer/Constituted Attorney VS SIKANDAR HAYAT KHAN and 3 other
Summary: Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)--
----O. XX, R. 11--Financial Institution (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, S. 22--Suit for
recovery before Banking Court--Repayment of decretal amount in installments--Banking Court
could not order for payment of decretal amount in installments without consent of bank--No
sufficient reasons--Once sufficient mortgaged property was available with bank to
recover decretal amount in lump sum, no justification to pass order for making payment
of decretal amount in installments--Banking Court had the option either to refuse the passing of
the consenting decree as there was no agreement between the parties on mode of payment or
Banking Court could itself after giving hearing to the parties on the issue and by giving sufficient
reasons could make order for payment of decretal amount in installments--Installments could not
be made by Banking Court without giving sufficient reasons, especially where the decree was a
consenting decree and the claimed suit amount was already reduced by the Bank--Impugned
judgment and decree passed by Banking Court to the extent of repayment of decretal amount in
installments was not sustainable and same was set aside.
Dr.Riaz Khan vs Abdur Rasheed
Summary: S.5,14 Limitation Act:Suit for compensation--Exclusion of time of proceedings in court without jurisdiction--Scope