Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

Govt of KPK vs Muhammad Anwar Khan

Citation: 2014 YLR 485

Case No: CR.No.1758

Judgment Date: 03/10/2013

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: O.IX,R-13,O.XXVII,R-1,O.I,R-10,S.79 CPC,S.8 SRA,Art.164,181 Limitation Act:Suit for possession of immovable property in possession of govt--Ex parte decree,setting aside of--Limitation

Mian Zia-ur-Rehman VS Syed Ahmad Hussain Shah

Citation: 2014 CLC 276

Case No: W. P. No. 730-A /2013

Judgment Date: 03/10/2013

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: S.54, 55, & 63 Representation of the People Act, 1976.Art: 199 of Constitution of Pakistan--Maintainability of writ petition--Procedure before Election Commission & Tribunal--appellate authority.

Orya Maqbool Abbasi v. Federation of Pakistan and others

Citation: 2014 SCMR 817, 2013 SCP 126

Case No: CONST.P.22/2013

Judgment Date: 03/10/2013

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry

Summary: The Central Selection Board (CSB), being a semi judicial forum, has been authorized to examine the cases of the officers justly and fairly. Notification of promotion of all the officers from BS-20 to 21 issued in pursuance of the recommendations of CSB is set aside with the direction to the competent authority to undertake the process of the promotion to all of them strictly in accordance with law on merits under section 9 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973, read with rules 7, 7A and 8 of the Civil Servants (Appointments, Promotions and Transfers) Rules, 1973 as well as Promotion Policy as amended up to date. The Government shall also undertake exercise to outline the objective criteria for promotion to make the civil servant an honest officer and free from political pressure.

SAEED ULLAH PARACHA VS HABIB BANK LIMITED

Citation: 2014 CLD 582

Case No: F. A. O. No. 18/2010

Judgment Date: 02-10-2013

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Amin-ud-Din Khanin-ud-Din Khan

Summary: Summary pending.

ASIF YOUSAF VS SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISIONCBR ISLAMABAD

Citation: 2014 SCMR 147

Case No: CIVIL APPEAL No. 62/2011

Judgment Date: 02-10-2013

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani

Summary: Summary pending.

MST HAFEEZ BEGUM THROUGH ATTORNEY VS MRS ZAINAB MUHAMMAD ALI

Citation: 2014 MLD 1000

Case No: SUIT No. 1224/2001

Judgment Date: 02-10-2013

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice Nazar Akbar

Summary: Summary pending.

ASIM SHAHZAD VS THE STATE

Citation: 2014 MLD 893

Case No: C.A No. L29-J AND CRIMINAL REVISION No. 166/2010

Judgment Date: 02-10-2013

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Abdul Sami Khan

Summary: Summary pending.

MEHBOOB ALIAS BOOBA VS THE STATE

Citation: 2014 YLR 989

Case No: C.A No. 24-A/2008

Judgment Date: 02-10-2013

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice Mrs

Summary: Summary pending.

SIKAR ALT VS THE STATE

Citation: 2014 YLR 1173

Case No: C.A No. D-227/2012

Judgment Date: 02-10-2013

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice Sajjad Ali Shah

Summary: Summary pending.

BANK OF PUNJAB THROUGH GROUP HEAD OF ITS SPECIAL PROJECTS VS ACCOUNTABILITY COURT NOLLAHORE

Citation: PLD 2014 Lahore 92, PLD 2014 LHC 92

Case No: WP No. 1709/2013

Judgment Date: 02-10-2013

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Sh. Ahmad Farooq

Summary: Summary pending.

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.05.2a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top