Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN VS CHAIRMAN ARBITRATION BOARD MARKET COMMITTEEKHANPUR

Citation: 2005 CLC 359

Case No: W. P. No. L 130/20Q4/BWP

Judgment Date: 23-08-2004

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Sh. Ahmad Farooq

Summary: Summary pending.

HAJI ZANZEER VS NOORUL AMIN

Citation: 2005 CLC 1276

Case No: RFA No. 150/2003

Judgment Date: 25-04-2005

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice Ijaz

Summary: Summary pending.

ASHRAM BIBI VS MUSA KHAN

Citation: 2005 CLC 973

Case No: RFA No. 3/1987

Judgment Date: 11-03-2015

Jurisdiction: Islamabad High Court

Judge: Justice Athar Minallah

Summary: (a) Benami Transactions: ----Ingredients for proving Benami transactions---Legal principles established by superior courts require proof of four essential elements to substantiate a claim of Benami ownership: Source of income used for the purchase of the property. Custody of original title documents and other relevant records. Possession of the property in question. Motive for the Benami transaction. ----In the present case, the plaintiff (predecessor-in-interest of respondents Nos. 1 to 5) alleged that funds for the property were sent by him from the United Kingdom and deposited into a joint account, but failed to establish the remaining elements of a Benami transaction, including possession of the property and custody of title documents. ----Cited Cases: Muhammad Saif ad Hussain v. Muhammad Anwar Hussain (1991 SCMR 703) Abdul Majeed v. Amir Muhammad (2005 SCMR 577) Jane Margrete William v. Abdul Hamid Mian (1994 CLC 1437) Ghulam Murtaza v. Mst. Asia Bibi and others (PLD 2010 SC 569) (b) Evidence and burden of proof: ----In cases involving Benami transactions, the burden of proof lies on the party asserting such a claim---Proof must be cogent, definitive, and based on admissible evidence rather than mere suspicion or conjecture---In the present case, the plaintiff’s evidence primarily focused on proving the source of funds but lacked sufficient proof regarding the other essential elements of a Benami transaction. ----Disposition: Appeal allowed---The judgment and decree dated 4-3-1987 were set aside, and the suit filed by the predecessor-in-interest of respondents Nos. 1 to 5 was dismissed---No order as to costs.

MUSHTAQ AHMAD OTHERSS VS MEHMOOD AHMAD

Citation: 2005 CLC 1827

Case No: CR No. -306/D/2004 AND C. M. No. 1002/2005

Judgment Date: 01-06-2005

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Jehangir Arshad

Summary: Summary pending.

MST PARVEEN JAMAL HASSAN VS MUSHTAQ UR REHMAN

Citation: 2005 CLC 1124

Case No: SUIT No. 1047/2011

Judgment Date: 12-02-2015

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice Nazar Akbar

Summary: Summary pending.

DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY VS CREEK MARINA PVT LIMITED PAKISTAN

Citation: 2005 CLC 772

Case No: SUIT No. 525/2011 C. M. AS. Nos. 12763/2013 AND 6229/2014

Judgment Date: 13-11-2014

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice Syed Saeeduddin Nasir

Summary: Summary pending.

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF S VS DILSHAD ALI

Citation: 2005 CLC 1061

Case No: CM. AS. Nos. 3541/2009 AND 945/2013 IN SUIT No. 217/2009

Judgment Date: 10-12-2014

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice Nazar Akbar

Summary: Summary pending.

RAFIQUE AHMAD VS MST SAKHOO MAI

Citation: 2005 CLC 1173

Case No: CR No. 234/1991

Judgment Date: 16-09-2004

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Jawwad S

Summary: Summary pending.

MALIK AHMAD KHAN VS RDISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER JHANG

Citation: 2005 CLC 1935

Case No: REVIEW APPLICATION No. 61/2005 IN WP No. 14308/2005

Judgment Date: 12-08-2005

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Mian Hamid Farooq

Summary: Summary pending.

MST SAID BIBI VS ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGEBAHAWALPUR

Citation: 2005 CLC 375

Case No: W. P. No. 1369/2004/BWP

Judgment Date: 12-07-2004

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Sh. Ahmad Farooq

Summary: Summary pending.

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.03.1a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top