Summary: The concept of Government as enunciated by the Apex Court in Messrs Mustafa Impex, Karachi & others Vs The Government of Pakistan( PLD 2016 SC 808) in normal connotation us equivalent to the term executive and the executive authority of the Province being exercisable in the name of the Governor by the Provincial Government, consisting of the Chief Minister and Provincial Minister which shall act through the cabinet Minister(s), therefore, through the aforesaid provisions i.e (Section 57(3), 59, 60, 61(4) and 64 of the Amending Act conferring these powers of the Provincial Government to the Chief Minister are thus a delegation which is contrary to Article 129 of the Constitution. Section 27(2) of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Local Government Act, 2013 substituted vide Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Local Government (Amendment) Act No. XXV of 2019 only to the extent of envisaging for holding Election for Village Council and Neighbourhood Council, as the case may be, on non-party basis are struck down being ultra vires Article 17 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 ( Constitution ). Similarly, part-II of 11th Schedule to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Local Government Act, 2013 inserted through Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Act No. XXV of 2019 to the extent of envisaging for election on non-party basis is also held ultra vires Article 17 of the Constitution and as a consequence thereof, the ongoing Election scheduled by the Election Commission of Pakistan through Notification dated 25.10.2021 for Election of Village Council and Neighbourhood Council shall be held on Party Basis.

Summary: Pitfalls of Judicial review over reach

Summary: Justice of Peace is not a court, hence application pending before it cannot be transferred under Section 526, Cr.P.C.

Summary: Authority has to exercise discretion reasonably, fairly, justly and free from discrimination, and mala fide. Public functionaries have to exercise discretionary powers in accordance with law and it cannot depend on their sole will/pick and choose. Discretion must be exercised judiciously and not arbitrarily.

Summary: Art 65 Oath of MPA.Art 69 proceedings in Parliament functionable or otherwise.

Summary: Allocation of developmental fund to MPA. Role of DDAC. Appointment of focal person.

Summary: Factual controversy cannot be resolved by High Court in its constitutional jurisdiction. interference by High Court in the affairs of the authority at this stage would amount to hamper the legal process. Dismissed.

Summary: 1. concept of authority and authorized officer discussed, only authority can initiate the departmental proceeding, the penalty. 2. Delegatee under the law or rules, cannot further delegate his power without being expressly given in such law.

Summary: --- Issues Presented:1)Whether the Supreme Court's suo moto judgment infringed on the right to a fair trial and due process under Article 10-A of the Constitution. --- 2)The legitimacy of directing the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to initiate proc

Summary: Under Article 143 of the Constitution if any conflict arises between the two enactments passed by the Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament) and the Provincial Assembly, then to the extent of repugnancy, the provisions of an Act of Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament) shall prevail and enactment of the Provincial Assembly shall be void. The Provincial Government directed to follow the criteria/ eligibility determined by PMDC, Rules made under Federal legislation for appointment of the petitioner.