Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
ALI SHER OTHERSS VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
RAFIULLAH VS ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL PESHAWAR HIGH COURT BENCH MINGORA DARUL QAZA SWAT
Summary: Summary pending.
M/s Trans Tech Pakistan VS Alternative Energy Development
Summary: Summary Pending
Abid Khan VS Gul Zaman Khan Abbasi & others
Summary: Summary Pending
Rafiullah vs State etc
Summary: Superdari application & jurisdiction of High Court: No rival claimant(Petition allowed)
RAMESH KUMAR UKRANI VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM NATURAL RESOURCES
Summary: Summary pending.
JAFFAR MEHMOOD OTHERSS VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
SHAH NAWAZ VS STATE ETC
Summary: Shah Nawaz, the petitioner, filed for post-arrest bail in response to an FIR (First Information Report) registered under Section 376 P.P.C. with the Derawar Police Station, Bahawalpur, alleging rape. The FIR was lodged by Mst. Zarina, accusing Shah Nawaz of raping her, stating the incident occurred in a cattle shed next to her house.The court observed a delay of 12 days between the occurrence (alleged to be on 27.4.2015) and the filing of the FIR (on 09.5.2015) and pointed out inconsistencies in the complaint. It noted the absence of identification sources for the accused in the FIR and questioned the lack of a clear explanation for the delay in reporting the incident. Additionally, the medical evidence did not conclusively support the prosecution's narrative of rape.The judge also highlighted that although the complainant was reported to be a virgin, the medical report indicated an old healed hymen, and the lady doctor did not confirm the occurrence of rape. Furthermore, the DNA test report was pending, and an FIR lodged by the accused party against the complainantís father revealed past animosity between the parties.The court accepted Shah Nawaz's petition for post-arrest bail, considering doubts raised in the case, Shah Nawaz's juvenile status, the absence of material evidence, and the pending DNA report. Shah Nawaz was granted bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.1,00,000 with one surety. The observations made by the court were provisional and confined to the bail petition's disposal.
SHER BAZ KHAN OTHERSS VS ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Summary: Summary pending.
QASIM HUSSAIN VS PVTC ETC
Summary: The petitioner, was serving as an Admission and Placement Officer, later promoted as Principal at the Vocational Training Institute Kot Mithan. However, following a special audit, allegations were made against him, leading to a charge sheet and an inquiry. The inquiry officer found certain charges proved and recommended penalties, including recovery of a specified amount and reduction in rank and pay scale. The competent authority imposed major penalties, leading to the petitioner's removal from service. The petitioner, feeling aggrieved, filed appeals, but they were rejected. Consequently, he filed a writ petition seeking the annulment of the orders and reinstatement into service. The petitioner argued that the disciplinary proceedings were initiated by a non-competent authority, and the allegations against him were not supported by evidence. In contrast, the respondents defended the legality of the imposed penalties, asserting that they were in accordance with the law and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate any legal infirmities in the orders. The court examined the records and found that while the inquiry officer recommended specific penalties, the competent authority diverged from these recommendations without explicitly stating the basis for the more severe penalties. The court concluded that the penalties imposed did not seem to align with the evidence on record and ordered the competent authority to re-consider the matter, give the petitioner an opportunity for a personal hearing, and decide within a specified period in compliance with the law.