Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
Sher Baz Khan etc VS Addl. District Judge etc
Summary: The respondents had filed a suit for permanent injunction against the petitioner's predecessor in interest regarding this land. The suit was subsequently decreed based on a compromise reached between the parties. The petitioner, as the legal heir of the deceased Muhammad Nawaz, filed an application under Section 12(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to set aside the compromise decree dated January 9, 1989. However, both the trial court and the Additional District Judge had dismissed the application, leading to this writ petition. The petitioner argued that the compromise and decree were unlawful because the land was owned by the Provincial Government and could not be transferred without prior government permission. The respondent countered these arguments, asserting that the transfer did not violate Section 19 of the Colonization of Government Land Act, 1912. They also emphasized that the petitioner's application was time-barred. It also mentions the concept of "part performance" under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, which could protect the respondent's rights. Ultimately, the court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the decisions of the lower courts and finding no reason for interference.
ABDUL JABBAR and others vs The STATE
Summary: Summary pending
MUHAMMAD JAVED and otherss vs ZAMEER HAIDER and 2 others
Summary: Summary pending
BADAR DIN VS PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR KHANEWAL
Summary: Summary pending.
Badar Din VS Province of Punja
Summary: In this case, the petitioner, had filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction regarding agricultural land he claimed to have been allotted to him under the Grow More Food Scheme. The petitioner alleged that the land had been allotted to him in 1974, but the District Collector, Multan, had cancelled the allotment in 1984 based on allegations of fraud. The petitioner appealed this decision, and the Commissioner Multan Division, Multan, accepted his appeal in 1986.The judgment discussed the legal aspects of the case, including the petitioner's claim to the land, challenges to the legality of various orders, and issues related to the locus standi (legal standing) of a third party (Muhammad Ilyas) who had filed an application against the petitioner's land allotment. The judgment ultimately sets aside the orders of the District Collector, Multan, and the Member Board of Revenue and remands the case back to the District Collector, Multan, for a detailed inquiry to determine whether there was any interpolation (alteration) in the revenue record and whether the petitioner had any role in any such interpolation. Additionally, the judgment declares the impugned judgments and decrees passed by the lower courts to be of no legal effect since the underlying orders were set aside.
MUNIR AHMAD vs ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE PUNJAB and 6 others
Summary: Summary pending
ABDUL QAYYUM and otherss vs GHAZALA ISMAIL and others
Summary: Summary pending
ABDUL REHMAN ALIAS SAIN VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
Suba etc vs Malik Falaksher
Summary: S.13 Pre-emption Act 1987:Requirements of Talabs (Talb-e-muwathibat)
Haji Khizan Khan vs Abdul Qayyum Khan
Summary: S.13 Pre-emption Act 1987:Requirements of Talabs (Talb-e-muwathibat)