Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: S.365,324,353,148,149 PPCStrong & exceptional grounds must exist for setting aside the acquittal order(Appeal dismissed)

Summary: S.42,54,12 SRA:Suit for declaration of title,permanent injunction & possession--immovable property given to wife in lieu of Nikah--Validity

Summary: Interpretation of constitutional provisions, specifically Article 175-A of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. The court emphasizes that even if one member of the Judicial Commission was deemed unqualified, it would not invalidate the proceedings leading to the nominations. The court supports this position by referring to a precedent, the judgment in the case of Managing Director, Sui Southern Gas Company LTD, Karachi v. Ghulam Abbas and Others (PLD 2003 SC 724). --- The case revolves around the recommendations made by the Judicial Commission of Pakistan in its meeting on October 22, 2012, where Mr. Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui was recommended as a Judge and Mr. Noor-ul-Haq N. Qureshi as an Additional Judge for a six-month period at the Islamabad High Court. The Parliamentary Committee confirmed these nominations and forwarded them to the Prime Minister, who was to send them to the President for appointment. However, the President did not issue the appointment orders, citing the participation of a supposedly unqualified member in the Commission's meeting.The court held that even if one member was deemed unqualified, it would not invalidate the proceedings since the nominations were made by a majority of the Commission's membership. The court referenced a previous judgment to support this view. After hearing arguments from both sides, the court accepted the petition and directed the concerned authorities to issue notifications for the appointment of Mr. Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui as a Judge and Mr. Noor-ul-Haq N. Qureshi as an Additional Judge of the Islamabad High Court, both appointments effective from the expiry of their earlier notifications.In the cited precedent, the court likely found a relevant legal principle or interpretation that supports the argument that the participation of one allegedly unqualified member does not vitiate the proceedings when the nominations are made by a majority of the commission's membership, as allowed by the constitutional provisions. The reliance on precedent adds a legal basis and authority to the court's decision, demonstrating a consistent interpretation of constitutional provisions in similar circumstances.