Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
SULEMAN LALANI (Plaintiff) V/S AL-ABBASS SUGAR MILLS LTD. & OTHERS (Defendant)
Summary: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act (XLII of 1997)--- ----Ss. 3 & 29---Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984), S.263---Powers of court and Security Exchange Commission to interfere in internal management of a corporate entity---Scope---Court would not interfere in internal management of companies, if they were working within parameters of law--- Commission could conduct investigation of affairs of company in exercise of its suo motu powers under S. 29 of Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act, 1997 or on application by members of company under S. 263 of Companies Ordinance, 1984---Failure of Commission to exercise its powers by invoking relevant enabling provisions to protect interest of minority shareholders in a company would frustrate very basis of its establishment.
MUHAMMAD AMIN ETC VS STATE
Summary: ----Ss. 302(b) & 324---Qatl-e-amd, attempt to commit qatl-e-amd---Appreciation ofevidence---Benefit of doubt---Contention of counsel for accused was that as two accusedpersons were declared innocent during course of investigation by the Police, otheraccus
MST AASIYA BIBI VS HABIB BANK LIMITED THROUGH MANAGER
Summary: Summary pending.
CANTONMENT BOARD THROUGH EXECUTIVE OFFICERCANTT BOARD RAWALPINDI VS IKHLAQ AHMED
Summary: Summary pending.
CHIEF ENGINEER PROJECT DIRECTOR THROUGH AUTHORIZED PERSONSPECIAL ATTORNEY VS ND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGEHYDERABAD
Summary: Summary pending.
FARAZ ALAM SOLANGI VS PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARYHOME DEPARTMENT
Summary: Summary pending.
GHULAM MUSTAFA VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS VS MS NIZAM IMPEX PVT LTDSALES TAX CENTRALEXCISE APPEAL KARACHI
Summary: Summary pending.
Mst. AASIYA BIBI and 5 others VS HABIB BANK LIMITED through Manager and 3 other
Summary: Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001)---
----S. 9---Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), S. 58(f)---Suit for recovery of bank loan---
Mortgage of property---Appellants were guarantors and assailed judgment and decree passed
by Banking Court on the plea that no guarantees were executed by them, as the same were
not available on Court record--- Validity--- Contention of appellants was contrary to record,
where personal guarantees were available---Once given the guarantees, it was not open for
appellants to wriggle out of it on a bald assertion that there was no guarantee available on
record---Appellants failed to point out any illegality in judgment passed by Banking Court---
Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.
Industrial Development Bank of Pakistan through Chief Manager v. Shaf Industries
(Pvt.) Ltd. and another 2006 CLD 743; Habib ur Rehman and another v. Judge Banking
Court No.4, Lahore and another 2006 CLD 217 and Messrs Taxila Cotton Mills Ltd. and 10
others v. Allied Bank of Pakistan Ltd. and 4 others 2005 CLD 244 ref.
Ghazala Arif v. Union Bank Ltd. (now Emirates Bank International), Lahore 2000
CLC 1201 re
MUHAMMAD MUNIR PIRACHA vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE AUDITII RAWALPINDI
Summary: Summary pending