Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

SAJJAD AHMED vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Interior Islamabad and 2 others

Citation: 2018 YLR 2668

Case No: Writ Petition No. 9113/2017

Judgment Date: 22/11/2018

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Muhammad Anwaarul Haq, J

Summary: Summary pending

Haji MOHAMMED ILYAS vs Haji MUSHTAQ AHMED through LRs

Citation: 2019 CLC 2041

Case No: Civil Revision No.80839/2017

Judgment Date: 22/11/2018

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Muzamil Akhtar Shabir, J

Summary: Summary pending

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Additional District Collector Jhang and anothers vs ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE JHANG and 2 others

Citation: 2022 MLD 1138

Case No: Writ Petition No.9498/2017

Judgment Date: 22/11/2018

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Safdar Saleem Shahid, J

Summary: Summary pending

Mariam Bibi alias Maria/Shakiba VS State

Citation: 2019 YLR 2082

Case No: Jail Appeal-65-2013

Judgment Date: 22/11/2018

Jurisdiction: Islamabad High Court

Judge: Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani

Summary: offence 9-C, CNSA ASJ Muhammad Adnan

Shafi-ur-Rehman Vs Aziz-ur-Rehman

Citation: 2019 CLC 1710

Case No: CR No. 128-D /2017

Judgment Date: 22/11/2018

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: The Court while sitting in revisional jurisdiction is not supposed to interfere in the concurrent finding of the learned lower fora unless it is established that the judgements of the two Courts below were without jurisdiction or the two Courts below acted illegally or with material irregularity resulting into miscarriage of justice. The word salehas been defined by section 54 of the TP Act, 1882.It is settled law that question of limitation does not arise in inheritance cases.

Muhammad Younas VS DPO Abbotabad

Citation: N/A

Case No: W.P No. 118-A /2015

Judgment Date: 22/11/2018

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: Section 22-A of CrPC Ex-officio Justice of Peace. Function performed by Ex-officio Justice of Peace U/s 22-A of CrPC are Quasi Judicial in nature, thus no illegality or irregularity was committed by it. While accepting Wakalatnama on behalf of respondents and allowing.Learned Counsel for argument as there was no bar to hear the other side before passing an appropriate order. Writ Petition dismissed.

M/s. Pakistan Reinsurance Company (Appellant) V/S Trustees of the Potr of Karachi (KPT) (Respondent)

Citation: 2019 CLC 1339

Case No: II.A. 85/2014

Judgment Date: 22/11/2018

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar

Summary: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)-------O. XXIX, R. 1---Suit for declaration on behalf of company---Recording of evidence---Procedure-Suit was dismissed on the ground that the person who appeared in the witness box for evidence on behalf of company was not an authorized person---Validity---Defendant in written statement had not challenged the maintainability of the suit for want of mandatory requirement of O. XXIX, R. 1, C.P.C.---Even issue for maintainability of suit was not framed by the courts below---Plaintiff-company was not required to hold a meeting of Board of Directors to decide by a Resolution as to who and how many would be witnesses in a particular suit to appear on behalf of the company---Courts below had erred in law while passing the impugned judgments and decrees---Matter was remanded to the Trial Court with the direction to decide the same afresh on merit on the basis of evidence available on record---Second appeal was allowed, in circumstances.

Nawaz Sharif Social Security Hospital through its Chief Executive Vs ADJ Lahore etc

Citation: 2018 LHC 2999, 2019 MLD 511 Lah

Case No: Writ Petition No.232496 of 2018

Judgment Date: 22/11/2018

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Ch. Muhammad Iqbal

Summary: The case involved a license agreement entered between the petitioner and respondents for the affiliation of the University College of Medicine & Dentistry with the petitioner's hospital in Lahore. The agreement was for a period of 10 years, allowing the university to use the hospital facilities for teaching purposes. The petitioner issued notices for the respondents to vacate the premises after the agreement's expiry, but the respondents filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction. The petitioner argued that the suit is not maintainable under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, as the agreement has expired and the respondents failed to fulfill its terms. The respondents claim to be tenants and have fulfilled their obligations. The agreement included clauses related to affiliation fees, monthly payments, and a 10-year term extendable with mutual consent. The petitioner served notices for non-compliance, termination, and non-renewal of the agreement. Despite this, the respondents continued occupying the premises, leading to the filing of the suit. The petitioner contends that the suit is misconceived and barred by law, and the court should reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside previous orders and rejecting the respondent's suit.

Arshad Begum VS Muhammad Sharif

Citation: Pending

Case No: Civil PLA No. 218 of 2018

Judgment Date: 22/11/2018

Jurisdiction: AJK Supreme Court

Judge: Justice (Name Withheld)

Summary: Summary Pending

MUHAMMAD AKBAR vs MASOOD TARIQ BAGHPATI and others

Citation: 2019 CLD 1

Case No: Appeal No. 222/2017

Judgment Date: 21/11/2018

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Aziz-ur-Rehman, JJ

Summary: Summary pending

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.05.2a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top