Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

Al-Arabia Sugar Mills Limited etc Vs FIA etc

Citation: 2020 LHC 2619, PLD 2021 Lahore 226

Case No: Criminal Proceedings40585/20

Judgment Date: 03/11/2020

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Mr. Justice Shahid Karim

Summary: Pending

Abdul Qadeer Vs Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal etc.

Citation: 2020 LHC 3921, 2021 P L C 87

Case No: Writ Petition No.85122 of 2017

Judgment Date: 03/11/2020

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Jawad Hassan

Summary: ----Production of fake documents to secure appointment---Scope---Petitioner was appointedas Upper Division Clerk under Employees Son's Quota but his appointment was withheld onthe ground of production of fake medical certificate---Labour Court as well as

vs MUHAMMAD FAROOQ RAJA Civil Petition No 405 of 2020 decided on 2nd November 2020

Citation: PLD 2021 Supreme Court 320

Case No: Case37711

Judgment Date: 02/11/2020

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Umar Ata Bandial, Yahya Afridi and Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi, JJ

Summary: Summary pending

FAHEEM AHMED vs The STATE

Citation: 2020 YLR 1354

Case No: 1st Criminal Bail Application No. S-655/2019

Judgment Date: 02/11/2020

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Muhammad Saleem Jessar, J

Summary: Summary pending

Abdul Rehman VS The State etc

Citation: 2021 PCRLJ 882

Case No: Writ Petition-2493-2020

Judgment Date: 2/11/2020

Jurisdiction: Islamabad High Court

Judge: Justice Lubna Saleem Pervez

Summary: Quashment of FIR In Case FIR No. 428/20 Dated 05.07.2020 Offence U/s 408/34 PPC, PS Tarnol, Islamabad

Rana Muhammad Arshad VS FOP etc

Citation: 2021 PLD 42 Islamabad

Case No: Writ Petition-2939-2020

Judgment Date: 2/11/2020

Jurisdiction: Islamabad High Court

Judge: Justice Athar Minallah

Summary: Petitioner is a jounalist who is aggrieved by harrasment by FIA authorities on the pretest of by cyber crimes, seeks protection from harrasment and seeks direction for provision of copies of the complaint

Khalid Nadeem Kiyani VS IG Police, Islamabad.

Citation: 2021 YLR 728

Case No: Writ Petition-2667-2020

Judgment Date: 2/11/2020

Jurisdiction: Islamabad High Court

Judge: Justice Lubna Saleem Pervez

Summary: Police Matter: Quashment of FIR: Offences U/s 25-D of Telegraph ACT, P.S Golra Sharif, Islamabad.

Ashiq Hussain Chaudhary & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Citation: 2021 CLC 1437

Case No: 5890/2018 Const. P.

Judgment Date: 02/11/2020

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui , Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain

Summary: [Cantonments Act 1924 (section 117), Cantonments Act 1924, Cantonments Act 1924 (section 179), Cantonments Act 1924 (section 181), Cantonments Act 1924 (section 108), Cantonments Act 1924 (section 116)] If at all any alteration is inevitable or the open spaces that vests with the Cantonment Board nowis required, the powers and jurisdictions vests with the Board with whose consultation the desired object could be materialized and not otherwise.

Ms Nestle Pakistan Ltd etc Vs Member NIRC etc

Citation: 2020 LHC 3936, 2021 P L C 56

Case No: Writ Petition No.48023 of 2019

Judgment Date: 02/11/2020

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Jawad Hassan

Summary: Industrial Relations Act (X of 2012)-------S.33---Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of1968), S. 2(i) & S.O.15---Redressal of individual grievances---"Workman"---Scope---Petitioner assailed rejection of its preliminary objection by the Member (National IndustrialRelations Commission), (NIRC) fixing of the case for respondent's evidence and the orderpassed by Full Bench of NIRC whereby its appeal was dismissed---Validity---Petitioner hadfiled reply before the Member NIRC wherein it had objected qua maintainability of thegrievance petition by stating that the respondent did not fall within the definition of"workman" as he was holding the post of Milk Collection Officer and was supervising thework of dozens of Milk Collecting Agents---Member NIRC without framing any issue hadrejected the preliminary objections of the petitioner, which was against the law---Constitutional petition was allowed and the Member NIRC was directed by the High Court toframe legal issue, arising out of the reply of the petitioner, record evidence and then decidethe same strictly in accordance with law.

M/s Cherat Cement Co. Ltd, Nowshera v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources and others

Citation: 2021 SCP 3

Case No: C.R.P.421/2020

Judgment Date: 02/11/2020

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Mr. Justice Mushir Alam

Summary: Writ Petition/Others

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.08.1OBS.

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top