Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
Javed Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Summary: Promotion (it appears that the policy of the respondent is uniform and without any discrimination .CP dismissed.)
Engr: Muharram Khan and Othes (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Summary: Whether the private respondents are undertaking the work of professional engineers in terms of the Pakistan Engineering Council Act, 1975, being Diploma Holders. And whether their case falls within the ambit of the ratio of the judgment passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maula Bux Shaikh supra or otherwise.
Saeed Babar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Summary: Seniority in service, cadre, or post to which an official is promoted is to take effectfrom the date of regular promotion to that service, cadre, or post and not from thedate of any ad-hoc induction
Syed Mansoob Ahmed Khatri and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Summary: principally the petitioners are seeking inclusion of `Orderly Allowance` in their pensionable emoluments in the light of Amendment No.19 in clause/regulation 46 of Chapter IV (Emoluments) of Civil Aviation Service Regulation-2014 (CSR-2014) and the decision of 179th meeting held on 1.8.2019 by Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority (PCAA) Board Secretariat---Accordingly, while following the principle of law enunciated in I.A. Sherwani's case (ibid), and in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case while invoking the jurisdiction conferred upon this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, we hereby declare the impugned decision /action/order of the Respondent-CAA is in negation to the strict and prohibitory command contained in Article 25 of the Constitution, because the Petitioners have been treated with sheer discrimination, which cannot be approved on any premises whatsoever.
Mazhar Ali. (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Pak Avenue Owners/Occup. Welf. Ass. & Others. (Defendant)
Summary: The undisputed record and the evidence adduced by the parties, concludes that Defendants and particularly Defendant No.1 was responsible for causing the death of the deceased Mazhar Ali, because despite collecting enormous amounts towards maintenance charges each month from different offices/Units in the said Building, the elevators / lifts were not maintained properly. Negligence rather callousness of Defendant No.1 in particular, is also proved from the undisputed fact that no remedial measures were taken even after another incident preceding the one of the present lis, in which a person was injured due to fault in one of the lifts (in the said Building).
Muhammad Ayub Khan Sanjrani (Plaintiff) V/S Province of Sindh & others. (Defendant)
Summary: Service Matter - Non Renewal of Contract of Employment - held - No vested right to get it renewed even against the Government - Injunction refused.
Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui and Others (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Summary: Article 140A of the Constitution. Local Government Elections cannot be delayed for want of any amendment in the Sindh Local Government Act 2013
Zabardast Khan Mehar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Summary: NAB Petition for Reduction of Surety Amount
Mst Aysha Begum (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Summary: Bonafide purchaser for value without notice Rule will apply where purchasers are not equally at fault with their predecessors. Property purchased on the basis of official record and transactions spreading over many years and did not change hands in quick succession showing undue haste, hence 5th owner cannot be penalized. Responsible officials of KDA to be dealt with strictly, DG KDA directed to hold enquiry and fix responsibility on officials involved in committing illegality and fraud, whether in service or retired, alive or dead, should be mentioned in the Inquiry Report. An alternate plot of same value and utility be allotted to the petitioner. Cost of Rs.100,000/- is imposed on respondent KDA payable to the petitioner.
Nooruddin and 05 others (Petitioner) V/S Federal Land Commissioner and others (Respondent)
Summary: The pivotal questions involved in the present proceedings are whether the subject land surrendered under Martial Law Regulation (MLR) 64 of 1959, which was resumed by Deputy Land Commissioner (DLC) Hyderabad vide order dated 17.6.1959, and its subsequent allotment to the petitioners became Qabuli Land? And, whether Civil Suit No.40/1972 filed by respondent No.7 was rightly decreed vide judgment and decree dated 23.10.1974, and its viries, could be called in question in Constitution Petition, in the terms paragraph 19 and 26 of Martial Law Regulation-1972? And, whether the Chief Land Commissioner, Sindh could pass the order after the judgment of Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Qazalbash Waqf, to re-determine of holding declaration under MLR/115/72 and LR-II/77 after the surrender of the excess land by the declarant, its resumption by the government; and its subsequent allotment to the petitioners in the year 1959 and 1960?