Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
AISH BAHADAR VS DISTRICT COLLECTOR SAHIWAL
Summary: Summary pending.
MUHAMMAD ABID VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
Imran Khan vs State
Summary: S.9C CNSAHuge quantity(18 kg),prima facie connected with offence,fall in prohibitory clause,S.21 CNSA is directory & non compliance curable u/s 537 Cr.PC(Bail dismissed)
MST. NASIRA AFRIDI VS MUHAMMAD AKBAR
Summary: Payment of rent, in any kind, is 'sina qua non' for the relationship of landlord and tenant. Burden of Proof under section 117 of Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 discussed----The case revolves around an ejectment petition filed by Muhammad Akbar against his sisters, claiming rent default. The sisters argue that they were living in an ancestral property and moved to another property owned by Muhammad Akbar upon his request. The main issue is whether they became tenants in the new property. The Rent Controller initially allowed the ejectment petitions, but the appellants challenged the decision. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that the landlord-tenant relationship was not established, as there was no evidence of rent payment.
SHAHID AZIZ & 13 others Versus CUSTODIAN EVACUEE PROPERTY, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD & 12 others
Summary: PLJ 2014 AJK 85 Present Sardar Abdul Hameed Khan J SHAHID AZIZ 13 others - - Petitioners versus CUSTODIAN EVACUEE PROPERTY AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR MUZAFFARABAD 12 others - - Respondents WP No 24 of 2004 decided on 252013 AJK Interim Constitution Act 1974 (VIII of 1974) - - - - - - S 44 - - Constitutional jurisdiction - - High Court cannot embark upon an inquiry of facts like omission to sue and commission of fraud - - Cancellation of allotment before custodian - - High Court not inclined to embark upon an inquiry of facts as agitated by petitioners and repudiated by respondent - - Finding of fact recorded being a Tribunal of exclusive jurisdiction which were ordinarily sacrosanct and no exceptional circumstances are involved in the case - - Petition was dismissed [P 88] A Mr Khalid Mahmood Khokhar Advocate for Petitioners Raja Raffiullah Sultani Advocate for RespondentsJudgement Result:Petition dismissed
MESSRS MULTAN TEXTILE ALLIED INDUSTRIES PVT LIMITED THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR VS HABIB BANK LIMITED THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER
Summary: Summary pending.
MST ALIA MEHBOOB VS UNIVERSITY OF SARGODHA THROUGH VICE CHANCELLOR
Summary: Summary pending.
MST KANIZ FATIMA VS SESSIONS JUDGE MUZAFFARGARH
Summary: Summary pending.
FAISAL MAQBOOL S VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION NO L OF CONSTITUTION PETITION NO OF
Summary: Summary pending.