Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
AMINA WELFARE TRUST REGD THROUGH EXECUTOR TRUSTEE VS ASHFAQ AHMAD QURESHI
Summary: Summary pending.
ZAHID PERVEZ VS BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH SECRETARY COLONIES LAHORE
Summary: Summary pending.
LIAQAT ALI OTHERSS VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
ANTI NARCOTICS FORCE THROUGH REGIONAL DIRECTORFORCE COMMER VS NASIR KHAN
Summary: Summary pending.
Aziz Ullah Vs State etc
Summary: S.302 PPCHonour killing u/s 345 Cr.PC is not compoundable (Bail dismissed)
Naseeb Khan Vs State etc
Summary: S.302,324,148,149 PPCSeven charged for single injury, wants further inquiry(Bail allowed)
SHAHID IMRAN VS STATE
Summary: The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302(b) PPC (Pakistan Penal Code) and sentenced to death for the murder of Muhammad Nawaz.The prosecution's case was based on the testimonies of the complainant, and his brother, Khizar Hayat, who witnessed the incident. However, the defense argued that the appellant was innocent and that the shooting had occurred due to a prior dispute. The defense also questioned the motive presented by the prosecution. The court considered the evidence, including the medical examination of the deceased, the recovery of a rifle allegedly belonging to the appellant, and the motive. Ultimately, the court found the appellant guilty of murder but decided to alter the sentence from the death penalty to life imprisonment due to mitigating factors and the benefit of the doubt. The court also maintained the compensation and the sentence of imprisonment in default thereof. The Murder Reference, which sought confirmation of the death penalty, was answered in the negative, and the sentence of death was not confirmed.
ZAHID PERVEZ VS BOR. ETC.
Summary: The petitioner had leased a piece of land for the purpose of setting up a fuel station but faced challenges, including the demolition of the petrol pump without prior notice. Legal proceedings ensued, and previous judgments were discussed in this document. Ultimately, the petitioner sought the issuance of a writ of mandamus to compel the respondents to honor their commitments and deliver possession of an alternate plot for the intended purpose. The document highlighted the legal arguments made by both the petitioner and the respondents, including references to constitutional rights and obligations. It noted that the respondents failed to comply with previous court orders and undertakings. The judgment, rendered by Justice Muhammad Sajid Mehmood Sethi, allows the petitioner's petition and directs the respondents to provide vacant possession of the plot to the petitioner within two months, settling any disputes with Idara-e-Kissan if necessary. Alternatively, the respondents were instructed to provide an equivalent plot or pay damages if the possession is not feasible.
JAMIA DARUL ULOOM ISLAMIA through President/Chairman vs ILYAS and others
Summary: Summary pending
THE STATE THROUGH PG SINDH VS HIDAYATULLAH
Summary: Summary pending.