Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Search Results: Categories: FATA (35 found)

M/s Waddan Hajj and Umra Services VS FOP through Secretary M/o Religious Affairs and others

Citation: Pending

Case No: Writ Petition 1854 2014

Judgment Date: 21/04/2014

Jurisdiction: Islamabad High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Anwar Khan Kasi

Summary: The petitioner, a Hajj and Umra group organizer, claimed entitlement to a 4% Hajj quota reserved for the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) after fulfilling the requisite conditions. However, the Ministry of Religious Affairs did not allocate the quota, allegedly without lawful justification. The petitioner applied for the Hajj Group Organizer quota under a policy set forth by the respondents. His application was not considered due to insufficient marks as per the policy. Aggrieved by the decision, the petitioner filed a representation for reassessment, but the Ministry delayed deciding the matter despite the approaching Hajj operations. ------- Issues: ------- 1) Whether the petitioner was entitled to a decision on his representation for the Hajj Group Organizer quota within a reasonable time. ------- 2) Whether the Ministry of Religious Affairs acted unlawfully by not considering the petitioner's application. ------- Holding/Reasoning/Outcome: The court referenced the precedent set in Dosani Travels vs. Federation of Pakistan ([PLD 2014 SC 1]), highlighting that applications for Hajj quotas must be decided in accordance with the policy and within a reasonable timeframe. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the Ministry be directed to decide on the representation within 15 days. The court deemed the request reasonable and plausible. The court directed Respondent No. 1 (Ministry of Religious Affairs) to decide the petitioner’s pending representation within 15 days and to inform the court through the Registrar. The petition was disposed of accordingly. ------- Citations/Precedents: Dosani Travels vs. Federation of Pakistan ([PLD 2014 SC 1]): Established guidelines for decision-making in Hajj quota allocations and highlighted the importance of timely resolution of such matters.

Abdul Bari etc Vs Director Livestock

Citation: PLD 2014 Peshawar 132 (158)

Case No: W.P No. 1741-P

Judgment Date: 07/04/2014

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: Jurisdiction of High Court in FATA....Article 247 of the Constitution...Tricaotomy of Power among the three organs of the state.

Rasheed Ahmad Khan VS Tribunal F C R Peshawar.

Citation: 2013 PCrLJ 1071

Case No: W.P. No. 2-B 2008

Judgment Date: 03/12/2012

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: Arts. 199,246 & 247(7) Constitution of Pakistan, 1973.Offence committed in FATA, Proceedings conducted under FCR,bars on jurisdiction of Supreme Court & High Courts.

Huma Saad VS Chairman Jiont Admision Committee Medical / Dental Colleges KPK Peshawar Dental Colleges KPK Peshawar

Citation: 2012 CLC 891

Case No: W.P.No.224-B

Judgment Date: 19/01/2012

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: Art. 199 Constitution of Pakistan, 1973.Educational institution.Reserved seat for FATA, IN/OUT quota, Object and scope.

Zair Ali VS Chief Engineer (FATA) Works and Services Department Peshawar.

Citation: PLD 2012 Peshawar 92

Case No: C.R.no.2288

Judgment Date: 25/11/2011

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: Art. 247 (7) Constitution of Pakistan. O. VII, R.10 C.P. S. 54 S.R Act. Jurisdiction of Courts pertains to matter hailing from tribal Areas.

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.05.2a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top