Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
MUHAMMAD ZEESHAN vs The STATE
Summary: Summary pending
MUHAMMAD BASHIR vs RUKHSAR and others Criminal Petition No1246 of 2019 decided on 16th April 2020
Summary: Summary pending
Mehr MUHAMMAD YOUSAF GILL vs GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and others
Summary: Summary pending
vs SULEMAN LALLANI and 9 otherss Suit No 579 of 2014 and CMAs Nos 4651 12391 of 2014 and 588 and 13510 of 2015 decided on 16th April 2020
Summary: Summary pending
vs FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE ISLAMABAD through Chairman and 4 otherss Suit No 42 of 2020 decided on 16th April 2020
Summary: Summary pending
NIAZ HUSSAIN vs The STATE
Summary: Summary pending
Sher Shah Malik VS Pakistan Broadcasting Corporation etc
Summary: Against impugned office Memorandum No.A-II/2(14)/2018 dated 06.06.2018 whereby petitioner has been refused medical allowance
Ghulam Ahmed Chaudhry VS Akbar Hussain etc
Summary: Against judgement and decree dated 29.07.2019 passed by the Learned ADJ Islamabad
MUHAMMAD YOUSUF AHMED & OTHERS (Applicant) V/S ARTISTIC DENIM MILLS LIMITED (Respondent)
Summary: The Petitioners hold 14.45% shares in respondent Company and are aggrieved by the notice as well as the proceedings of the impugned Meeting dated 19.10.2019 and the resolutions passed thereon, whereby, related party transactions were approved in respect of 2 Companies, which have certain common Directorship. It is their case that they hold more than 10% of the shareholding and are, therefore, qualified to institute present proceedings, under s.136 of the Companies Act, 2017 which according to them has seriously prejudiced their interests. According to them statement of material facts under Section 134(3) of the Act, annexed with the impugned notice of meeting, failed to include the minimum information required under Regulation-5 of the Company (Related Parties Transactions and Maintenance of Related Records) Regulations, 2018, whereas, the meeting was also conducted without following proper procedure and has deprived the Petitioners from exercising their rights. However, the Petitioners have failed to make out a case for indulgence; hence, this petition fails and is accordingly dismissed with pending applications.