Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
DADAN ALIAS DAD MUHAMMAD VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
MUHAMMAD ASLAM VS KHURSHEED ALIAS BAGO ETC CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF KHURSHEED VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
MUHAMMAD ASLAM VS KHURSHEED ALIAS BAGO
Summary: Summary pending.
MS MEHRAN AGENCY COMPLAINANT VS SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION ISLAMABAD
Summary: Summary pending.
MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE VS THE DIRECTOR GENERAL PAKISTAN RANGERS SINDH SHEIKH ZAYED ISLAMIC CENTRE UNIVERSITY ROAD KARACHI
Summary: Summary pending.
MST NARGIS MOEEN VS GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY DEFENCE ISLAMABAD
Summary: Summary pending.
HYUNDAI HIDCO HAKAS JOINT VENTURE VS WATER POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Summary: Summary pending.
MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL ATTORNEYPRINCIPAL OFFICER VS SHAFTS PAK ASSOCIATES PVT LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE
Summary: Summary pending.
AHMAD All Versus MUKHTAR AHMAD and 13 others
Summary: PLJ 2003 Lahore 420 (DB) Present MAULVI ANWAR - UL - HAQ AND MIAN HAMID FAROOQ JJ AHMAD All - Appellant versus MUKHTAR AHMAD and 13 others - Respondents RFA No 201 of 1995 heard on 2622002 (i) Qanun - e - Shahadat 1984 (10 of 1984) - - Arts 100 101 - Provisions of Art 100 of Qanun - e - Shahadat deals with original document while certified copies are the subject matter of Art 101 of Qanun - e - Shahadat 1984 - Under Art 101 of Qanun - e - Shahadat it is not the age of original document but it is the age of certified copy which is relevant for the purpose of admissibility if said document which is relevant for purpose of admissibility of said document when produce [P 423] A (ii) Qanun - e - Shahadat 1984 (10 of 1984) - - Art 74 - Civil Procedure Code (V o 1908) OXLI R 23 - Remand of case - Respondents plea that his client be given a chance to produce and prove original document ie power of attorney executed by his predecessor in favour of respondents predecessor - Case was remanded for production and proof of such evidence [P 423] B Malik Abdul Wahid Advocate for Appellant Mr Jarri - Ullah Khan and Mr MA Zafar Advocates for RespondentsJudgement Result:UFA allowed.
CHIEF ENGINEER HYDEL (NORTH) AND PROJECT DIRECTOR, WAPDA WARSAK Versus ZAFRULLAH SHAH ASSISTANT (BPS-15) CIVIL DEFENCE DIRECTORATE NWFP, PESHAWAR and another
Summary: PLJ 2003 SC 200 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present ABDUL HAMEEU DOGAR AND SARDAR MUHAMMAD RAZA JJ CHIEF ENGINEER HYDEL (NORTH) AND PROJECT DIRECTOR WAPDA WARSAK - Appellant versus ZAFRULLAH SHAH ASSISTANT (BPS - 15) CIVIL DEFENCE DIRECTORATE NWFP PESHAWAR and another - Respondents CA No 708 of 1997 decided on 2412003 (On appeal from the Judgment dated 431996 of the NWFP Service Tribunal Peshawar passed in Appeal No 4151995) (i) Civil Procedure Code 1908 (V of 1908) - - S 21 - No objection to jurisdiction takes before Service Tribunal or forum of first instance such objection cannot be raised either in appeal or revision and that too if failure of justice had occurred in decision of case [P 204] D (ii) Civil Service Regulations - - Reguln 418 (b) - - Respondent voluntarily resigned from WAPDA to join Civil Defence Directorate - Respondents entitlement to pensionary benefits for services rendered in WAPDA - - Case of respondent would fall under Sub - Regulation (b) of Regulation 418 where under resignation of an appointment to take up another appointment service in which counts is not a resignation of public serviceAs public service continues and as service in both appointments counts such principle of common sense is enunciated in Regulation 418 (b) where under respondent would be entitled to pensionary benefits of his past service rendered in WAPDA [P 202] A (iii) Civil Service Regulations - - Reguln 418 (b) - Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Art 212 - Respondents claim to pensionary benefits and Provincial Service Tribunals jurisdictionRespondent was entitled to pensionaiy benefits under Regulation 418 (b) of Civil Service Regulations and NWFP Service Tribunal had jurisdiction to entertain his claim against WAPDA [P 205] E (iv) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) - - Ait 212 - Appeal against judgment of NWFP Service Tribunal - Competency of Provincial Service Tribunal for rendering its decision against WAPDA challenged on the ground of lack of jurisdicuon - Important factors to be considered while determining Jurisdiction of a Tribunal would be firstly entity and status of employee whether a civil servant or not and secondly as to whether his claim is with regard to terms and conditions of his service - Additionally it has to be seen with specific care as to which type of civil servant or servants such Tribunal is constituted for - Federal Civil Servants would have recourse to Federal Service Tribunal while for Provincial Civil Servants Provincial Service Tribunal would have jurisdiction - Respondent being a Provincial Civil Servants only Provincial Service Tribunal would have jurisdiction [Pp 203 204] B C Mr Muhammad Latif Khan ASC and Syed Maqbool All Shah Director WAPDA for Appellant Mr Attiq - ur - Rehman Qazi ASC and Mr Hussain Khan AOR for Respondent No 1 Mr Jehanzeb Rahim AG NWFP for Respondent No 2Judgement Result:Appeal dismissed