Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

SHOAIB ALIAS SHABOO VS THE STATE

Citation: 2012 PCrLJ 147

Case No: C.A No. 389-J/2006 AND MURDER REFERENCE No. 571/2006

Judgment Date: 06-06-2011

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Manzoor Ahmad Malik

Summary: Summary pending.

COMMISSIONER LEGAL VS MS EFU GENERAL INSURANCE LTDINL REVENUE

Citation: 2012 PTCL 121

Case No: I. T. R. AS. Nos. 158 TO 160/2010

Judgment Date: 06-06-2011

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed

Summary: Summary pending.

MST SURRAYA IQBAL VS PAR CO

Citation: PLD 2012 Lahore 271, PLD 2012 LHC 271

Case No: DIARY No. 2217-/2011

Judgment Date: 06-06-2011

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Rauf Ahmad Sheikh

Summary: Summary pending.

ABID VS THE STATE

Citation: 2013 YLR 585

Case No: C.A No. 1138 AND MURDER REFERENCE No. 578/2006

Judgment Date: 06-06-2011

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry C

Summary: Summary pending.

Muhammad Anar Khan son of Mohammad Siddique, caste Arrain, resident of Hajka, Tehsil Bhalwal, District Sargodha Versus The State

Citation: Pending

Case No: Criminal Appeal No36-I/2010

Judgment Date: 6/6/2011

Jurisdiction: Federal Shariat Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: Summary Pending

NHA VS M/s Hakas Pvt. Ltd.

Citation: PLD 2011 Islamabad 43

Case No: First Appeal Against Order-189-2010

Judgment Date: 6/6/2011

Jurisdiction: Islamabad High Court

Judge: Justice Riaz Ahmad Khan

Summary: Summary Pending

ZULFIQAR VS FATEH SHER

Citation: 2011 LHC 4144, 2011 YLR 2725

Case No: Civil Revision No.398 of 2003

Judgment Date: 06/06/2011

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Ameer Bhatti

Summary: (a) Islamic Law-------Inheritance, opening of---Effect---Legal heirs(s) alive at time of death of deceased would getinheritance---Principle.(b) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)-------Art. 117---Beneficiary of a document or fact would be bound to prove the same.(c) Co-owner-------Limitation would not run against co-owner(s) in land---Rationale.Limitation does not run against the co-owners. The rational behind is that the revenue record isprepared periodically and after preparation of every periodical record, fresh .cause of actionarises to the aggrieved party and the share of all the co-sharers remains intact in each and everyinch of the land unless the property is partitioned and the point of limitation is renderedineffectual.PLD 1969 SC 617; PLD 2005 AJ&K 15; 1985 MLD 101; 2003 MLD 399; 2000 SCMR 1574;PLD 1993 Pesh. 127 and 2003 MLD 399 ref.

KHURSHEED AHMAD vs The STATE and another

Citation: 2017 PCrLJ 1664

Case No: Criminal Appeal No. 93/2010

Judgment Date: 04/06/2011

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Hafiz Shahid Nadeem Kahloon, J

Summary: Summary pending

THE STATE COMPLAINANT VS AKBAR ALI HASHWANI ACCUSED

Citation: 2011 SBLR 215

Case No: CASE No: 01/2005

Judgment Date: 04-06-2011

Jurisdiction: SPECIAL COURT COMMERCIAL, Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice Saathi M

Summary: Summary pending.

TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KARACHI VS MS STARD CHARTERED BANK PAK LTD

Citation: 2012 SBLR 985

Case No: 1ST APPEAL (B) No. 126/2010

Judgment Date: 04-06-2011

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Ather Saeed

Summary: Summary pending.

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.05.2a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top