Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: S.9C CNSA:Conscious knowledge of contraband wants further inquiry(Bail allowed)

Summary: S.54 SRA,O.VII,R-10 CPC,Art 247(7) Constitution of Pak:Suit for injucntion--matter pertained to tribal areas--suit returned--jurisdiction of High Court

Summary: Art. 247 (7) Constitution of Pakistan. O. VII, R.10 C.P. S. 54 S.R Act. Jurisdiction of Courts pertains to matter hailing from tribal Areas.

Summary: Presumption of truth and correctness attached to the mutation is rebuttable---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)-------Ss. 8, 39, 42 & 54---West Pakistan Land Revenue, Act (XVII of 1967), S.39---Suit forpossession, cancellation of registered deed, declaration and permanent injunction---Mutation---Presumption---Scope---Plaintiff claimed that he had purchased suit property from its ownerthrough mutation and said property was in possession of husband of the defendant as tenant---Husband of defendant subsequently died and his widow/defendant was residing in the suitproperty---Plaintiff filed ejectment application against widow of deceased tenant, who deniedrelationship of landlord and tenant between the parties and claimed to be owner of the property---Said ejectment application having been dismissed, plaintiff had filed suit for possession,declaration, etc. against the defendant, widow of deceased--Defendant, claimed that her latehusband had purchased suit property from original owner through registered sale-deed---Validity---Record had revealed that suit property had remained throughout in possession of thepredecessor of the defendant and the plaintiff had never remained in possession of the same---Mutation in the record of rights did not create title in favour of the person in whose favour entryhad been recorded, nor the mutation entry could be used as a document of title, but mutation entry would raise a rebuttable presumption in favour of the person in whose favour the entry hadbeen made---Said presumption could be rebutted by the person challenging such entry byproducing evidence contrary to the mutation---Presumption of truth and correctness attached tomutation existing in the name of the plaintiff with regard to suit property, was rebutted by itscontents, wherein it had been mentioned that possession of suit property had been delivered tothe plaintiff, whereas possession was not delivered to the plaintiff and it was with predecessor ofdefendant---Presumption was further rebutted as the plaintiff had throughout failed to prove thestatus of the predecessor of defendant as tenant---In view of registered sale-deed in favour ofpredecessor of the defendant, mutation had lost its significance and had no legal value; and samewould not confer any right or title in favour of the plaintiff to claim possession---Impugnedjudgment passed by the Appellate Court had also revealed that Appellate Court, after dueappraisal of evidence on record and after discussing the issues framed, found the plaintiff notentitled for the relief claimed and had rightly dismissed appeal on merits---Concurrent findingsof the courts below, not being result of mis-reading or misappreciation of evidence, could not beinterfered with in revisional jurisdiction of High Court.Dilber Hussain v. Muhmoodul Hassan and 3 others PLD 1986 Quetta 198 ref