Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
MURSALEEN VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
SIKAR VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
ZAHOOR GHALOO VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
Tasam Ali Bukhari vs Ghulam Mustafa
Summary: O.XXXVII,R-2,3 CPC,S.118 Negotiable Instruments Act:Suit on basis negotiable instruments--issuance of checque--burden--proof of
Najeebullah vs Amin-ur-Rehman
Summary: S.4 Tenancy Act,S.42 SRA:Occupancy tenant--right of ownership--established through revenue record--payment of rent not proved
Abdullah vs Bashir Ahmad
Summary: Gift made by attorney on behalf of principal--Scope--Donee not specifically nominated by principal--Effect
Ishan ul Haq vs Bahramand Khan
Summary: S.12,42,54, SRA:Suit for Specific performance of contact--Temporary injunction,grant of--subject to deposit the outstanding amount
Mst. Alim Taj V. Mst. Sahib Jan and 2 others,
Summary: Benami transaction-------Suit for decarlation, possession, rendition of accounts and injunction---House mutated inname of step-mother of plaintiff was alleged to be purchased by his deceased father asbenamidar---Proof---Plaintiff's witnesses had not deposed in court to have witnessed payment ofsale price of suit house by plaintiff's father---Plaintiff had admitted not to be present at time ofsuit transaction---Plaintiff had failed to prove purchase of suit house and payment of its price byhis father---Step-mother during life-time of her husband had transferred suit house to a thirdperson through mutation, but he did not challenge same---Plaintiff's oral version was contrary tosuch documentary evidence---Admission of witness of step-mother in cross-examination thatdeceased had made payment of sale price of suit house, would not carry any weight as burden toprove suit transaction to be benami was lying on plaintiff---Deceased during his life time hadnever claimed that his wife (plaintiff s step-mother) was benamidar of suit house---Suit wasdismissed in circumstances. 2001 CLC 1599 and 2005 SCMR 577 ref.Abdul Haq v. Mst. Surrya Begum 2002 SCMR 1330 and Ghulam Murtaza v. Mst. AsiaBibi and others PLD 2010 SC 569 rel.
Musawir Ahmed and others V. Ghulam Rasool and another,
Summary: West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)-------Ss.13 & 15---Ejectment of tenant on the ground of failure to comply with the order of RentController to deposit rent in time---Scope---Landlord instituted eviction application against theappellant/tenant---Rent Controller directed the tenant/appellant to deposit monthly rent with thecourt---Appellant/tenant failed to deposit the rent by complying with the order of RentController, consequently impugned ejectment order was passed---Contention of theappellant/tenant was that as he had already deposited the entire rent, therefore order of evictionwas illegal---Validity---Report of Civil Nazir of the court showed that appellant/tenant had notdeposited the rent in compliance of the order of Rent Controller and deposited rent persistentlylate---Appellant/ tenant had failed to furnish/offer reasonable explanation for such delayeddeposits---Appellant in case of delay, had to explain and justify each day's delay in the deposit ofrent and mere deposit of outstanding rent in lump sum was not sufficient to save the tenant frompenal consequences---Impugned order passed by Rent Controller was in accordance with law---Appeal was dismissed.
GADA ALI ABRO vs The STATE
Summary: Summary pending