Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
MUHAMMAD NAZIR VS MUHAMMAD IQBAL
Summary: Summary pending.
Naveed Anjum vs State
Summary: S.302 PPCAppreciation of evidence,not directly charged,prosecution failed to proved the case(Acquitted)
Malik Muihammad Miskeen vs Haji Obdaidullah Khan
Summary: S.3(2)(a),70,70-A KP Conservation & Exploitation of Forest in Hazara Div Ord,S.42 SRA:Agreement against prohibition contained in statutory law---effect--- suit for declaration,non issuance of statutory notice---effect
Malik Umer Farooq Vs Federation & others
Summary: Art. 199 Constitution of Pakistan, 1973.S. 3 & 4 (1) Cantonment Act 1924Not challenging vires of Cantonment Act or basic notification?Estoppel by conduct & law of acquiescence.
Muhammad Nazir VS Muhammad Iqbal
Summary: S. 13 W.P Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance,1959Art.199 Constitutional petition---Bona fide personal need of landlord--Tenancy for a particular period.
Malik Muhammad Miskeen VS Haji Obdaidullah Khan
Summary: Art. 199, S. (2) (a), 70, 70-A KP Conservation & Exploitation of Forest in Hazara Division Ord 1980-- Agreement against prohibition contained in statutory law is void.
IRSHAD AHMAD VS STATE ETC
Summary: The prosecution has itself made it a case of two versions in respect of the petitioner, one mentioned in the FIR and second narrated in the supplementary---The complainant through supplementary statement improved its case and tried to bring case of the petitioner punishable under section 114 Cr.P.C provided punishment for abetment in case where the abettor was present at the spot at the time of occurrence--- It is settled principle of law that benefit of doubt has to go to the accused at bail stage. Post arrest bail accepted.
MUHAMMAD YASIN Versus MUHAMMAD RIASAT and 13 others
Summary: PLJ 2013 SC (AJK) 153 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present Muhammad Azam Khan CJ and Ch Muhammad Ibrahim Zia J MUHAMMAD YASIN - - Appellant versus MUHAMMAD RIASAT and 13 others - - Respondents CA No 55 of 2011 decided on 22112012 (On appeal from the Judgment of the High Court dated 1622010 in Civil Appeal No 163 of 2005) Amendment of Plaint - - - - - - Tentative assessment and appreciation of over - all material - - Validity - - Prima - facie proposed amendment neither creates new cause of action nor it changes complexion of suit - - Objection of contradictory stand has no substance [P 156] A Amendment of Plaint - - - - - - Application for amendment was filed at appellate stage - - Contention of - - Such belated prayed amendment cannot be allowed - - Mere delay in filing amendment application was not a valid reason for refusal of prayed amendment [P 156] B PLD 1990 SC AJK 1 ref Amendment of Plaint - - - - - - Amendment in pleadings be allowed liberally to avoid multiplicity of litigation and resolve real and substantial controversies - - It is now almost celebrated principle of law that for doing complete justice and avoid multiplicity of litigation amendments in pleadings have to be liberally allowed [P 157] C Ch Muhammad Mehfooz Advocate for Appellant Mr M Zakria Bhatti Advocate for RespondentsJudgement Result:Appeal dismissed
MESSRS BANK ALFALAH LIMITED VS THE PRESIDING OFFICER
Summary: Summary pending.
QAZI MUHAMMAD ILYAS S VS QAZI MUHAMMAD RAEES
Summary: Summary pending.