Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
SULTAN MUHAMMAD VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INL REVENUE KHAN
Summary: Summary pending.
GUL FARAZ ALIAS PALEY KHAN VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
MUMTAZ S VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
IBRAHEEM OTHERSS VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
Gul Faraz vs State
Summary: S.302,404,34 PPCAppreciation of evidence,testimony of related & interested witness,prosecution failed to prove the case(Acquitted)
SULTAN MUHAMMAD KHAN VS DY. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ETC
Summary: Notice issued under section 140 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, without holding the director of a Company liable under section 139, was in violation of fundamental right of 'Fair Trial' and 'Due Process' as guaranteed under Article 10A of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973.
Haji Muhammad Hussain VS Mst.Lal Khatoo
Summary: The dispute centered around a suit for declaration filed by Mst. Lal Khatoon against the appellants, claiming ownership and possession of certain lands. She alleged that the appellants, who were her real brothers, had cultivated the land and shared the produce with her, but they stopped doing so and falsely claimed that she had transferred the property to their mother, Mst. Bharwana, through fraudulent mutations.The trial court decreed in favor of Mst. Lal Khatoon, and her claim was upheld by the appellate court as well. The appellants then filed this Civil Revision before the Lahore High Court, challenging the lower courts' decisions.The Lahore High Court, after examining the evidence and considering the arguments presented, concluded that the judgments and decrees of the lower courts were not erroneous. The court found that the plaintiff had promptly filed the suit upon discovering the disputed mutations and that the appellants had failed to prove the gift transactions in their favor. Therefore, the court dismissed the Civil Revision and upheld the decisions of the lower courts, confirming Mst. Lal Khatoon's ownership and possession of the disputed lands.
STATE VS IBRAHEEM 2-IFRAHEEM S/O USMAN
Summary: Acquittal----The incident occurred when the appellants allegedly opened fire on the victims, resulting in the deaths of two individuals. The complainant in the case, Muhammad Iqbal, asserted that the motive behind the murders was related to a civil litigation and enmity between the parties involved. During the trial, the prosecution presented seventeen witnesses, including the complainant and an eyewitness, who provided their account of the incident. However, their statements were found to be inconsistent and changed over time. The medical evidence presented during the trial also raised doubts about the prosecution's case. The trial court acquitted several co-accused individuals due to a lack of evidence. The appellate court, upon reviewing the case, found that the witnesses' changing statements, inconsistencies, and the absence of independent corroborative evidence created reasonable doubts about the appellants' guilt. Therefore, the court acquitted Ibraheem and Ifraheem of the murder charges and did not confirm their death sentences. Additionally, the court dismissed related applications for the restoration of appeals and the placement of certain documents on record. The appellate court acquitted the appellants due to doubts about their guilt, citing inconsistencies in witness statements and a lack of independent evidence, and did not confirm their death sentences.
MUHAMMAD FAROOQ KHAN vs MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN and 2 others
Summary: Summary pending
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONEIII vs Messrs IGI INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
Summary: Summary pending