Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
Naib Khan vs State
Summary: S.302,34 PPCHeinous offence,prima facie connect with offence,fall under prohibitory clause (Bail dismissed)
Amjad Ali vs Anwar Shah
Summary: S.8,9 SRA:Suit for possession via ejectment--competency--denial of relationship as tenant & landlord
Jan Bahadar vs Fazli Subhan
Summary: S.13 Pre-emption Act:Requirements of Talabs,performance of--determination of market value of suit land--cost for standing trees
MR ZAIN UL AZIZ KHAN BABAR VS MINISTRY OF INTER PROVINCIAL COORDINATION ETC
Summary: The petitioner argued that the appointment process did not adhere to the rules and regulations governing the appointment of public officials. The petitioner asserted that the Pakistan Sports Board was established under the Sports (Development and Control) Ordinance, 1962, and its composition and rules are outlined in The Pakistan Sports Board Rules, 1981. The Director General of the Pakistan Sports Board is an important member of the Board, and the appointment process for this position is governed by The Pakistan Sports Board Service Rules, 2000. The petitioner contends that Dr. Akhtar Nawaz Ghanjera did not meet the necessary criteria for the Director General position, and his appointment was made without following proper procedures, including advertising the position as required by the rules. The petitioner also argues that Dr. Ghanjera's initial appointment as Director General Tech and subsequent promotion to Director General were not in compliance with the law. Ultimately, the court finds that Dr. Akhtar Nawaz Ghanjera's appointment as Director General of the Pakistan Sports Board was in violation of the law and declares his appointment as "without lawful authority." The court sets aside the appointment and declares the position vacant, to be filled by the competent authority following proper legal procedures.
THE CIR. VS M/S. ISLAM STEEL MILLS
Summary: The document discussed a reference application made under Section 133 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, challenging an order passed by the Appellate Tribunal, Inland Revenue, Lahore. The main legal issue in this case revolved around whether the Tribunal erred in canceling an order passed under Section 161/205 of the Ordinance based on its earlier judgment, which the applicant argues is in contravention of a judgment by the Supreme Court of Pakistan. The central question is whether the Tribunal was required to follow the Supreme Court's judgment and whether the elements necessary for initiating proceedings under Section 161 of the Ordinance were met. The arguments presented by both the applicant and the respondents, and the Tribunal's reasoning in its impugned orders. It also refers to the "Bilz judgment" from the Supreme Court of Pakistan, which seems to be a relevant legal precedent for the case. The judgment ultimately concluded that the orders of the Inland Revenue Officer and the Commissioner Inland Revenue were valid, and the Tribunal erred in setting them aside.
Mst GHAFOORAN BIBI vs MUHAMMAD AMIN NASIR and others
Summary: Summary pending
Messrs MAGNA PROCESSING INDUSTRIES (PVT) LTD vs APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE and others
Summary: Summary pending
MUHAMMAD SHAH alias MUDASAR SHAH vs The STATE
Summary: Summary pending
FARIDULLAH SHAH OTHERSS VS SYED INAMULLAH SHAH BACHA
Summary: Summary pending.
MUHAMMAD IQBAL VS CUSTODIAN EVACUEE PROPERTY AJK
Summary: Summary pending.