Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
Jihad Ali Vs State
Summary: S.9-C CNSA.Prima facie connect with offence,not entitled for concession of bail(Bail dismissed)
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE ICCBS VS SYED EJAZ AHMED SOOFI
Summary: Summary pending.
SAID ZAMAN KHAN OTHERSS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
Summary: Summary pending.
DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT DISTRICT GILGIT VS HASHIM WALI
Summary: Summary pending.
Shahzada Muhammad Umar Baig Vs Sultan Mehmood Khan & others
Summary: According to provisions of section 56(d) of Specific Relief Act, 1877 no injunction can be granted to hamper the public work.
Asfandyar & another v. Kamran & another
Summary: The case revolved around the petitioner's involvement in FIR No. 278, registered for offenses under Sections 302/324/34 P.P.C. related to the murder of Abdul Razzaq and Wali Jan and the attempted murder of the complainant and his uncle Muhammad Arif. The trial court appointed a Commission under Section 539-B Cr.P.C. to verify the authenticity of the site plan regarding a wall shown as a close end. The petitioner's counsel argued that the Commission was appointed in response to the defense's request to proceed against the investigating officer for perjury. They contended that modern device-obtained documents, like CCTV footage, were admissible without concern for Article 79 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. The High Court found that the trial judge's appointment of the Commission under Section 539-B Cr.P.C. was inappropriate, as it assumed the role of an investigating officer, prejudicing the fairness of the proceedings. Moreover, while CCTV footage could be produced, its authenticity must be proven according to the provisions of the Order, 1984. The High Court also noted that the revisional jurisdiction under Section 561-A Cr.P.C. wasn't an alternative to express remedies provided under Sections 435 to 439 Cr.P.C. However, it found the judgment reasoned and well-grounded, declining the petition for leave to appeal.
ALI HAIDER KHAN vs PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary and 7 others
Summary: Summary pending
vs OIL AND GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY and others
Summary: Summary pending
Muhammad Ismail VS PMDC, etc.
Summary: Summary Pending
Zahir Shah vs Abdul Ghafrfar etc
Summary: Under Order VI Rule 4 & 7 and Section 115, C.P.CTo annul the concurrent findings, it is necessary that the petitioner should bring on record any illegality or irregularity, which was not considered by fora below.