Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
vs Ch MUHAMMAD AKRAM and others CMAs Nos 204 and 233 of 2017 in CRP No474 of 2016 decided on 20th January 2017
Summary: Summary pending
MOHIB ALI vs RETURNING OFFICER WARD NO4 KHAIRPUR and 17 others
Summary: Summary pending
ABDUL GHAFOOR vs ALLAH MAAFI and others
Summary: Summary pending
GHULAM NABI vs SAIFULLAH and others
Summary: Summary pending
GHULAM SAJJAD VS MSTTOOBA
Summary: Summary pending.
JAVED KHAN ALIAS BACHA VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
Dr. Muhammad Saeed VS Sardar Muhammad Akram etc
Summary: Summary Pending
Zeenat Bibi Vs Fazal Haq
Summary: Order XLI Rule 24 CPC.Remand of the case un-necessary... territorial Jurisdiction in family cases. Framing of specific issue is not that much necessary if evidence on that particular point is available.
Jabar Vs Habib-ur-Rehman
Summary: Ss. 115,151, Order 14 R. 5 CPCFraming of additional issue by High Court.
Javed Khan v. The State
Summary: Acquittal granted----The appellants during the identification proceedings had informed the conducting Magistrates that they had earlier been shown to the witnesses. The objection was recorded but the Magistrates surprisingly did not attend to it, which constituted a serious lapse on their part. The prosecution witnesses who identified the accused persons before the Trial Court had a number of opportunities to see the accused persons before their statements were recorded. Neither the Forensic Science Laboratory nor any of the policemen, who had retrieved the bullet and its casing and had kept them in custody and then delivered them to the Laboratory, mentioned the marks affixed on the seals affixed on the parcels in which the said items were delivered to and received by the Laboratory----The appellants were Javed Khan alias Bacha and Raees Khan, and they were appealing against their conviction for the murder of Haji Muhammad Hazir. The judgment was delivered by Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa. The Rawalpindi Bench of the Lahore High Court had upheld the conviction of the appellants, with Raees Khan being sentenced to death and Javed Khan to imprisonment for life. However, their conviction under section 392 of the Pakistan Penal Code (?PPC?) was replaced with section 394 PPC read with section 34 PPC, and they were each sentenced to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment with a fine of fifty thousand rupees. The prosecution's case revolved around the murder of Haji Muhammad Hazir, which was reported by his son Nasir Mehmood in FIR No.513/2000. The appellants were accused of attempting to rob Haji Muhammad Hazir's general store and subsequently murdering him when he resisted. However, critical witnesses mentioned in the FIR were not produced by the prosecution during the trial. The identification parades conducted for the appellants were criticized by the defense for various irregularities, including prior exposure of the witnesses to the appellants. Additionally, concerns were raised about the forensic report regarding the matching of the bullet casing with the pistol recovered in another case. Ultimately, the Supreme Court acquitted both appellants of all charges based on the lack of credible evidence and the procedural irregularities observed during the trial.