Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

Eng. Saeed Ahmed and others V. Chairman National Highway authority, Islamabad and others ,

Citation: 2019 PLC CS 1475

Case No: Constitutional Petitions Nos. 363, 913 of 2013

Judgment Date: 14/05/2019

Jurisdiction: Balochistan High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Ejaz Swati

Summary: Constitution of Pakistan-------Art. 199---Saked Employees (Re-instatement) Act (XXII of 2010), S.4(b)---Reinstatement on orders of the High Court---Issuance of writ by the High Court against anotherHigh Court---Scope---High Court could not issue a writ against another Bench of same HighCourt or against another High Court with regard to an order regarding re-instatement inservice passed in judicial capacity.

Collector of Customs v. M/s Faisal Enterprises

Citation: 2019 SCMR 1126, 2019 SCP 186

Case No: C.A.251/2015

Judgment Date: 14/05/2019

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB

Summary: Background:The respondent imported two consignments of FIR Steel Sheets from Ukraine. The actual transaction values reflected in the invoices were USD 175 and USD 180 per metric ton, respectively. However, at the time of inspection, the appraising staff assessed the goods to be of secondary quality and valued them at USD 174 per metric ton. The respondent declared the goods to be of secondary quality at USD 157 per metric ton during ex-bonding.---Issues:Whether the goods should be assessed based on the actual transaction value or the value assessed by the appraising staff.Whether the respondent is liable to pay duty based on the assessed value.---Holding/Reasoning/Outcome:The court held that under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act, duty is to be levied based on the price actually paid or payable when sold for export to Pakistan. Since the declared values matched the actual transaction values reflected in the invoices, the Letter of Credit, and the Goods Declaration, there was no need to invoke Section 25(5) to assess the goods. The court emphasized that the differential amount is liable to be recovered from the respondent based on the undisputed transaction values. Therefore, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned judgment was set aside.---Quote:The question of invoking sub-section 5 of section 25 of the Customs Act 1969 does not arise at all if the value of the goods can be assessed on the basis of transaction value (the price actually paid or payable for the goods sold for export to Pakistan) under sub-section 1 of section 25 of the Customs Act 1969.

Development Authority and others VS Raja Shahzad Akhtar and others

Citation: Pending

Case No: Civil Appeal No. 40/2010

Judgment Date: 14/05/2019

Jurisdiction: AJK Supreme Court

Judge: Justice (Name Withheld)

Summary: Summary Pending

Mst NADIA SHAKEEL and anothers vs SHAGUFTA BAQAR and anothers

Citation: 2021 CLC 1712

Case No: Suit No.789/2018

Judgment Date: 13/05/2019

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Nazar Akbar, J

Summary: Summary pending

MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ vs The STATE and another

Citation: 2018 PCrLJ 1025

Case No: Criminal Miscellaneous No. 156490-B/2018

Judgment Date: 13/05/2019

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Abdul Sami Khan, J

Summary: Summary pending

NASEER KHAN vs The STATE Criminal Jail Apeal No(s)1 of 2018 decided on 13th May 2019

Citation: PLD 2019 Balochistan 47

Case No: Witheld

Judgment Date: 13/5/2019

Jurisdiction: Unknown

Judge: Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar and Abdullah Baloch, JJ

Summary: Summary pending

vs IMRAN HANIF and 9 others Suit No2022 of 2015 decided on 13th May 2019

Citation: PLD 2019 Sindh 564

Case No: Witheld

Judgment Date: 13/5/2019

Jurisdiction: Unknown

Judge: Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, J

Summary: Summary pending

ASIF SALEEM vs CHAIRMAN BOG UNIVERSITY OF LAHORE and others Writ Petition No28791 of 2019 decided on 13th May 2019

Citation: PLD 2019 Lahore 407

Case No: Case27021

Judgment Date: 13/5/2019

Jurisdiction: Unknown

Judge: Jawad Hassan, J

Summary: Summary pending

GULZAR AHMAD vs ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and others

Citation: 2019 CLC 1432

Case No: Writ Petition No. 257462/2018

Judgment Date: 13/05/2019

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Shahid Bilal Hassan, J

Summary: Summary pending

KHADIM HUSSAIN SHAH vs The STATE through National Accountability Bureau

Citation: 2022 YLR 1174

Case No: Criminal Appeal No. D-135/2018

Judgment Date: 13/05/2019

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui and Khadim Hussain Tunio, JJ

Summary: Summary pending

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.05.2a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top