Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
Kamran v. Kamran Malik and another
Summary: Bail granted---Facts:Three real brothers, Waseem Aslam, Waqas Aslam, and Siddique Aslam, were shot dead on 14.1.2020 within the precincts of Police Station Bhana-Marri, Peshawar.Kamran Malik, the complainant, survived the assault.Muhammad Ishaq is assigned as the assailant who fatally shot the brothers.The petitioner, Kamran, who is the son of Muhammad Ishaq, is blamed for allegedly instigating his father to commit the crime.A previous brawl is cited as the motive for the crime.---Issues:Whether the petitioner's alleged instigation of his father to commit the crime falls within the ambit of subsection 2 of section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898.Whether the petitioner should be kept behind bars during the trial or released on bail.---Holding/Reasoning/Outcome:The Court observed that while the violence and loss of life were significant, the petitioner, although present at the scene, was not directly implicated in causing harm to the victims.The petitioner's alleged role in persuading his father to commit the crime brings the accusation within the ambit of the relevant legal provision.The Court determined that since the investigation was complete and the petitioner's continuous detention was unlikely to serve any useful purpose for the prosecution, he should be released on bail.The criminal petition was converted into an appeal, and the petitioner was granted bail upon furnishing bonds of Rs.500,000/- with two sureties each to the satisfaction of the trial court or duty judge.
BAPTIST vs The STATE Special Criminal AntiTerrorism Appeals Nos 9 and 10 of 2020 decided on 29th July 2020
Summary: Summary pending
Khushdil Khan Malik VS AGPR etc
Summary: Against impugned order dated 10.02.2020 whereby suit of the plaintiff was rejected
United Bank Ltd. Through Regional Chief Executive UBL through Manager Shara-e-Hali Quetta V. Fareedullah Khan and another,
Summary: Balochistan Industrial Relations Act, 2010 (XIV of 2010)------Ss. 41 & 54(2)--Petitioner was serving as cashier--Transfer of petitioner--Continuous absence from duty--Termination from service--Departmental appeal--Disposed of--Grievance application--Partly allowed--Modification in termination order--Question of whether modification in quantum of penalty madeby labour appellate tribunal commensurate with undisciplined act of respondent--Entitlement for beneficiaryemoluments--Service policy--Challenge to--Lacking of element of habitual absenting--Although respondent?sundisciplined act of continuous absence from duty stood proved, but element of respondent being habitual inabsenting himself from duty is lacking--Thus, being not a case of habitual absence, penalty of termination fromservice obviously appears harsh, as it amounted to expelling and bringing penniless on road an employee,without recognition of his long length of service i.e. 19 years, entitling him to have beneficiary emoluments ofsuch past service--We concur with decision of Labour Appellate Tribunal, who after well attending fact andcircumstances of case has rightly modified termination order of respondent as compulsory retirement--Petitiondismissed.
NASEEBULLAH vs The STATE CP No 578 of 2020 decided on 28th July 2020
Summary: Summary pending
ABDUL RAUF GUJJAR vs JUDGE ATCIII LAHORE and others
Summary: Summary pending
MOHAMMAD WAJID MURSHID and another vs SILK BANK LIMITED
Summary: Summary pending
MUHAMMAD ALIM vs The STATE
Summary: Summary pending
M/s Iffat Rana VS FOP etc
Summary: PIMS, Service Matter, Ante-dated upgradation in post Assistant Nursing Superintendent