Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Plj 1993 Fsc 17 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present AU - Ama DR FlDA Muhammad Khan And Nazir Ahmad Bhatti JJ Bash1r and 2 others - Appellants versus The State - - Respondent Jail Criminal Appeal No75I of 1992 partly accepted on 15121992 Pakistan Peual Code 1860 (xlv of 1860) - - - S39534 read with Section 397 - Dacoily - - Offcnce of - - Conviction for - Challenge toIt is proved from evidence that appellants 1 and 3 had committed dacoily with abetment of appellant No2 in house of complainant party and during commission of that offence they had also injured 5 persons - - Khizar Hayal PW permanently lost one eye as a result of shot fired at him by appellant NolHeld All three appellants are guilty of offence of committing dacoity in process of which they caused fatal injuries with deadly weapons - Held further Appellants could legally be convicted under Section 39534 read with Section 397 but could not be separately sentenced under Sections 307 and 326 Ppc for causing grievous hurt - Conviction under Section 397 altered to that under Section 39534 read with Section 397 and sentence maintained but conviction under Sections 307 and 326 Ppc set aside [p22] Abc Mr SM Abdul Wahab Advocate for Appellants Mr Muhammad Aslam Uns Advocate for SlateJudgement Result:Both appeals dismissed.

Summary: Plj 1993 Quetta 40 (db) Present Munawar Ahmad Mirza CJ and Amirul Mulk Mengal J Muhammad Anwar Mengal and 13 others - Petitioners versus Privatisation Commission Ministry OF Finance Governmentof Pakistan and 2 others - Respondents Const Petition No416 of 1992 dismissed on 16 - 12 - 1992 Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil Industry (Control and Development) (Second Amendment) Act 1992 (xi of 1992) Clause (4) Employees of Chilten Ghee Mills Termination of services of hallenge to Whether transferee organization had obligation to retain petitionersfor a minimum period of 12 months after taking over control of Mills and whetherremedy of writ jurisdiction can be available to them Questions of Clause (4) ofAct explicitly prescribes competency of Federal Government to impose limitationsproviding terms and conditions of employees of privatized establishments in public interest Held Petitioners have acquired legal right by operation of law and execution of agreement and respondent No 3 was bound to retain the for 12 months Held further Since relief sought in constitutional petition turns against only private limited company and relations between parties being primarily based on contract are regulated by principle of master and servant constitutional jurisdiction is not available Petition dismissed [Pp 43 44] Abcdef Pld 1969 Dacca 352 Pld 1979 Karachi 246pld 1981 SC 224 Pld 1984 SC 170pld 1966 SC 445 Pld 1966 SC 8481971 Scmr 566 1987 Scmr 1776 Pld 1979 Lahore 803 Pld 1984 SC 194 1990 Scmr 1404 1990 Mld 546pld 1992 SC 531 and Pld 1992 Karachi 190 rel Mr Tariq Mehmood Advocate for Petitioners Mr M Rlaz Ahmad Standing Counsel and MrKNKohli Advocate for RespondentsJudgement Result:Petition dismissed.

Summary: Summary pending

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.