Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Search Results: Categories: Insurance (44 found)
Karim Bux Tanwri & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Citation: N/A
Case No: 755/2020 Const. P.
Judgment Date: 13-OCT-21
Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Summary: Group Insurance Policy matures only on death; petitioners who are alive; retired and have crossed the age of 65 years are not entitled for refund or return of contribution made by them during service.
M/s. EFU General Insurance Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Jahangir Moghul (Respondent)
Citation: N/A
Case No: M.A. 8/2016
Judgment Date: 09-FEB-21
Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court
Judge: Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Summary: [Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, Civil Procedure Code CPC] As per Section 118 of the Insurance Ordinance, 2000, a claim is to be settled within ninety days, subject to certain conditions contained in the above provision. Consequently, finding of learned Tribunal, even on this issue, does not justify any interference.
Arshad Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Citation: N/A
Case No: 4356/2019 Const. P.
Judgment Date: 01-SEP-21
Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court
Judge: Justice
Summary: [Sindh Civil Servant Welfare Fund Ordinance 1979 (Group Insurance)] Without prejudice to above, since there is consent order, no review was preferred even that order was not assailed. In case, if there was no deduction by the department and they were sending salary directly to the account; that is not justification to withhold group insurance. Accordingly, Secretary Health, Government of Sindh shall ensure that group insurance amount is paid as per her entitlement to the nominee without any delay. While parting this order, learned AG Sindh shall ensure presence of any focal person of Accountant General Sindh (A.G. Sindh) to assist this Court that under what capacity complete salary was transferred and they failed to deduct the amount and who were responsible with regard to such irregularity, if any. This exercise shall be completed within 15 days.
Latif Farooqi (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan International Airline Corporation Limited (Defendant)
Citation: N/A
Case No: Suit 1476/2019
Judgment Date: 25-FEB-22
Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court
Judge: Justice
Summary: In terms of the written understanding, the plaintiff`s insurance claimshould have been forwarded to the Insurance Department with available record,immediately after 12.6.2017 however, they took about six months when theManager Insurance and Terminal Benefit for payment of loss of licenseinsurance was appraised of such fact of the plaintiff`s medical inability. Thereference to insurance company was made through AGM claims on 27.6.2018i.e. after more than a year of expiry of policy and plaintiff being declared unfit.The plaintiff was then informed that the insurance company rejected claim ofthe plaintiff as insurance policy was expired and his case was forwarded torelevant insurance company belatedly
Pak Legal Database
How can we help?
Choose a service below and WhatsApp will open with the correct command ready for you.
Talk to Obsidian
2 free / day
Ask a legal question and Obsidian researches Pakistani case law and legislation for you.
It reads judgments, traces authorities and verifies citations before answering.
›
Citation Bot
10 free / day
Send a Pakistani citation such as 2024 SCMR 1 and Citation Bot finds the judgment for you.
The matching judgment PDF is sent directly to your WhatsApp.
›
General Chat
Need help with your account, membership, billing or a PLDB feature?
Message our team directly and we will assist you.
›
WhatsApp: +92 327 5871727