Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN ALIAS BAGGA VS THE STATE

Citation: 2014 PCrLJ 479

Case No: CrM No. 847/M/2013

Judgment Date: 02-12-2013

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Arshad Mahmood Tabassum

Summary: Summary pending.

CONSTITUTION PETITION NO OF

Citation: 2014 PSC 1

Case No: CONSTITUTION PETITION No. 52/2013

Judgment Date: 02-12-2013

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry

Summary: Summary pending.

MUHAMMAD SARWAR VS THE COLLECTOR APPEAL CUSTOMS CUSTOMS ABDUL QAYYUM HOUSEPESHAWAR ETC

Citation: 2014 PTCL 292

Case No: APPEAL No. CUS-217/PB/2011

Judgment Date: 02-12-2013

Jurisdiction: Tribunals

Judge: Justice Gulab Shah Afridi

Summary: Summary pending.

Mst.Shah Room vs Mst.Khaista Bibi

Citation: 2014 YLR 1193

Case No: CR.No.5941-M

Judgment Date: 02/12/2013

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: S.42 SRA,O.VII,R-11,S.11,12(2) CPC:Declaratory suit,Right of inheritance would not be defeated by law of limitation or principle of res judicata

Gul Usman etc vs DC

Citation: 2014 CLC 1681

Case No: CR.No.456-M/2013

Judgment Date: 02/12/2013

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: S.42 SRA,S.4,6,17,18,23 Land Acquisition Act,S.9 CPC:Declaratory suit--When forum provided by special law,civil suit not competent

Engr. Basaant Lal Gulshan V. Rozi Khan Kakar and others,

Citation: 2014 CLC 917

Case No: Election Petition No.1 of 2012

Judgment Date: 02/12/2013

Jurisdiction: Balochistan High Court

Judge: Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail

Summary: (a) Senate (Election) Act (LI of 1975)-------Ss. 34, 36, 43 & 45---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XI, R.13, O. VI, R. 15 & FormNo. 5 Appendix-C---Election petition---Law and procedure---Senate election for Technocrat'sseat---Non-filing of affidavits of private witnesses with the petition---Non-signing of scheduleand annexures attached with the petition---Effect---Election petition, its schedule and annexuresshould be signed by the petitioner and should be verified on oath---Order VI, R.15, C.P.C. fixedresponsibility on a party to personally verify the facts of the pleadings and documents---Separateverification of document(s) was not required if same was/were discussed in a pleadings andplaint was verified on oath---If document(s) were not discussed or described in pleadings butsame were annexed with the same through a schedule then both schedule and document(s)should be signed by the person intended to produce them and verified on oath---Documentsrelied upon by the petitioner and filed along with his petition had been described in the electionpetition which had been signed and verified on oath---Such documents were not annexures,therefore no schedule and separate verification of the same was required---List of witnessesshould be filed with the petition if a party desired to summon any official witness/s justifying his/their production and also to mention the documents which were required to be provedthrough such witness(es)---Witness who was not author of a document/certificate could not be anevidence about the observation of his predecessor and his evidence was immaterial and was ofno use---Affidavits of private witnesses were required to be filed with the election petition butsame had not been done so by the petitioner---Provisions of Section 43 of Senate (Election) Act,1975 were directory in nature as no penal consequence had been provided in the said Act for itsnon-compliance---Election petition could not be dismissed due to non-filing of affidavits of thewitnesses---Last opportunity to submit affidavits of private witnesses was to be provided to thepetitioner.Black's Law Dictionary rel.(b) Words and Phrases-------"Schedule"---Meaning---"Schedule" was a written or a printed statement showing brief detailof a document or contained a list showing a brief description of a document.Black's Law Dictionary and Concise Oxford Dictionary rel.(c) Senate (Election) Act (LI of 1975)-------S. 36 (3)---"Annexure" as used in S.36(3), Senate (Election) Act, 1975---Meaning---"Annexure" meant to join or add especially something larger, or to append or attach to asignificant thing or in addition to main document, report or a pleadings---"Annexure" was/werethe document/documents which had not been described in a main document, a report or a petitionbut was/were sought to be produced in support of its contents---Documents containing additionalgrounds of allegation of a substantive nature or at least furnished a better particulars of theallegation in addition to what had been described in a petition or a report, only such document/swas/were to be considered as "annexures"---Documents which had been described in thepleadings and subsequently attached to it did not come within the definition of "annexures"irrespective of the fact that same had been marked as "annexures".

MIAN KHUDA BAKHSH VS THE COMMISSIONER ETC

Citation: 2013 LHC 3159, 2016 YLRN 75 Lah

Case No: Writ Petition No. 13543 of 2013

Judgment Date: 02/12/2013

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Abid Aziz Sheikh

Summary: [ the word shall and as far as possible In the first part in Section 8(1) the word "shall" has been used, therefore, the same is mandatory, whereas in the second part in section 8 (2), the words "as far as possible" are used which give discretion to the authorities and does not make this provision absolute and mandatory. It is settled law that where the order is in excess of jurisdiction, without jurisdiction and in manifest breach of some law, the same can be set-aside by this Court in constitutional jurisdiction

MUHAMMAD IMRAN vs The STATE and another

Citation: 2022 MLD 1603

Case No: Criminal Appeal No.157/2012

Judgment Date: 01/12/2013

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Asjad Javaid Ghural, J

Summary: Summary pending

BB SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITED IN THE MATTER OF

Citation: 2015 CLD 612

Case No: SHOW CAUSE NoTICE No. 1(9) SMD/MSRD/C&IW/2013

Judgment Date: 29-11-2013

Jurisdiction: SECP

Judge: Justice Imran Inayat Butt

Summary: Summary pending.

WASI SECURITIES SMC PRIVATE LTD VS CHAIRMAN SECP

Citation: 2015 CLD 521

Case No: APPEAL No. 10/2012

Judgment Date: 29-11-2013

Jurisdiction: SECP

Judge: Justice Tahir Mahmood

Summary: Summary pending.

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.05.2a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top