Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
WAPDA VS Ch. M. Masoom (Mirpur)
Summary: Background:
The petitioner, WAPDA, acquired land from the respondent for the Mangla Dam Raising project. The land, comprising various kinds and used for commercial purposes, was initially compensated at rates ranging from Rs. 50,000/- to Rs. 5,00,000/- per kanal. The respondent filed a reference application seeking a higher compensation rate of Rs. One Crore and ten lac per kanal. The Reference Judge enhanced the compensation to Rs. 8,33,333/- per kanal along with 15% compulsory acquisition charges (CAC). Both parties appealed, and the High Court further increased the compensation to Rs. 10,00,000/- per kanal with 15% CAC.
----Issues:
1- Whether the High Court erred in enhancing the compensation rate to Rs. 10,00,000/- per kanal.
2- Whether the compensation should be uniform irrespective of the kinds of land acquired.
----Holding/Reasoning/Outcome:
The Supreme Court of Azad Jammu and Kashmir converted the petition into a regular appeal and directed the petitioner to deposit security. The Court noted that an appeal against the same impugned judgment was also filed by the respondent, and both cases were to be heard together.
----Citations/Precedents:
The appeal filed by the respondent titled "Ch. M. Masoom vs. Collector Land Acquisition" Civil Appeal No. 43 of 2021.
Mughal Foundation VS Inquiry Commissioner (Mirpur)
Summary: Background:
The petitioner, Mughal Foundation Hospital, represented by its Administrator, Mirza Iftikhar Qayyum, challenged an order of the High Court dated 02.04.2021, which denied their application for interim relief. The Inquiry Committee, formed in compliance with an order of the Apex Court, had prepared and submitted a report. The petitioner sought to maintain the status quo and requested an expeditious decision on the main case.
----Issues:
1- Whether the High Court erred in denying the application for interim relief.
2- Whether the status quo should be maintained until the High Court decides the main case.
----Holding/Reasoning/Outcome:
The Supreme Court of Azad Jammu and Kashmir disposed of the petition along with the application for interim relief. The Court directed the High Court to expedite the disposal of the main case and ordered that the status quo be maintained in the meantime.
vs NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU (NAB) and others Civil Petitions Nos3637 and 3638 of 2019 decided on 16th June 2021
Summary: Summary pending
s vs AMIRULLAH and others
Summary: Summary pending
ADEEL ARSHAD vs ISHFAQ AHMAD CHAUDHRY DC KHANEWAL and others ICA No 453 of 2019 decided on 16th June 2021
Summary: Summary pending
STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN through Zonal Head/Attorney and others vs Mst MAI BHAGAN
Summary: Summary pending
EJAZ AHMAD vs The STATE and another
Summary: Summary pending
Muhammad Hafeez etc VS Ali Asghar alias Aksar Khan
Summary: Against dismissal of Section 104 appeal against grant of stay in respondent's case
Pakistan Housing Authority Foundation VS Commissioner Inland Revenue Islamabad etc
Summary: Seeks stay over recovery till appeal is decided
M/s AFCOO Oil and Gas Field Services VS Assistant Commissioner of Inlad Revenue etc
Summary: Petitioner seeks stay over recovery till appeal and stay is decided