Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

TCS VSMST. HASEENA BEGUM

Citation: 2021 LHC 8579, PLD 2022 Lahore 524

Case No: First Appeal Against Order-First Appeal against order (Under Special Laws)-Punjab Consumer Protection Act 2005101-12

Judgment Date: 24/12/2021

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Mr. Justice Sultan Tanvir Ahmad

Summary: Pending

MUHAMMAD NASIR VSJOP ETC

Citation: 2021 LHC 8554, 2023 PCrLJ 222 Lahore (Multan Bench)

Case No: Writ Petition-Criminal Proceedings-Registration of Case17716-21

Judgment Date: 24/12/2021

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Mr. Justice Ali Zia Bajwa

Summary: Present provincial medico legal system is comprising of 90% doctors, who do not meet the minimum qualification threshold, which is offensive to right to fair trial as ensured under Article 10-A of the constitution. Opinion of medical examiner without furnishing supporting reasons loses its sanctity.

Muhammad Khalid Mushtaq Vs Board of Revenue etc

Citation: 2021 LHC 8448,

Case No: Settlement45094/21

Judgment Date: 24/12/2021

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Mr. Justice Ch. Muhammad Iqbal

Summary: The Chief Settlement Commissioner under Section 13 of the Displaced Persons Land Settlement Act, 1958 has the jurisdiction to issue Notifications i.e. Notification No. 236-66/948-R(L) dated 24.02.1966 [published in the Gazette of West Pakistan dated 8th April, 1966] as well as notification dated 16.05.1973 and also to declare any property/land as building site and also possessed jurisdiction to hold inquiry- determine and declare the validity of allotment of evacuee land even after repeal of the evacuee laws in 1975.

AMEER BAKHSH VSASJ ETC

Citation: 2021 LHC 8305, 2022 PCrLJ 1188

Case No: Writ Petition-Criminal Proceedings-Registration of Case16880-21

Judgment Date: 24/12/2021

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Mr. Justice Ali Zia Bajwa

Summary: Marriage without observing the period of Iddah does not entail commission of cognizable offence as defined under section 4 and punishable under section 5 of The Offence of Zina (Enforcement Of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979.

vs The STATE and others Criminal Appeals Nos 38038 30076 and Criminal Revision No 30079 of 2019 heard on 23rd December 2021

Citation: PLD 2022 Lahore 645

Case No: Witheld

Judgment Date: 23/12/2021

Jurisdiction: Unknown

Judge: Muhammad Amjad Rafiq, J

Summary: Summary pending

SADAF AZIZ and otherss vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others

Citation: 2021 PCrLJ 205

Case No: Writ Petitions Nos. 13537 and 27421/2020

Judgment Date: 23/12/2021

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Mrs. Ayesha A. Malik, J

Summary: Summary pending

Dr Sajjad Arshad VS DG Trade Organization etc

Citation: Pending

Case No: Writ Petition 4347 2021

Judgment Date: 23/12/2021

Jurisdiction: Islamabad High Court

Judge: Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb

Summary: DG TO: Petitioner is a trade organization impugns order by DG To wherein his name was excluded from voter list of Pakistan Poultry Association.

Syed Abdul Rasheed VSRana Muhammad Anwar

Citation: 2021 LHC 9420, 2023 YLR 309 Lahore (Multan Bench)

Case No: Regular Second Appeal-Regular Second Appeal (US 100) Final Decree-Specific Performance8-08

Judgment Date: 23/12/2021

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Mr. Justice Anwaar Hussain

Summary: In a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell, the appellate court below was duty bound to consider the evidence of both sides in its entirety and thereafter arrive at a finding - Once the learned trial court exercises its discretion in one way or the other after appreciation of entire evidence and material on record, the appellate court below should not interfere unless it is established that the discretion has been exercised perversely, arbitrarily or against judicial principles. In the instant case, it was incumbent upon the learned appellate court below to have firmly concluded that the Agreement to sell had been proved without relying on the deficiencies and gaps in the testimony of defendant.

Kamran . Vs The State etc.

Citation: 2021 LHC 8332, PLJ 2022 CrC 1241,PLD 2022 Lahore 645

Case No: Jail Appeal38038/19

Judgment Date: 23/12/2021

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Mr. Justice Muhammad Amjad Rafiq

Summary: Child rape, meaning of penetration; Tender years' exception to hearsay; Difference between recognition and identification.

Senior Air Hostess Samina Saleem Qureshi Vs Pakistan International Airlines etc

Citation: 2021 LHC 8221, 2022 PLC CS 642 Lahore

Case No: Civil Revision76153/21

Judgment Date: 23/12/2021

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Mr. Justice Rasaal Hasan Syed

Summary: Pending

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.05.2a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top