Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

MUHAMMAD WASEEM VS THE STATE ETC.

Citation: 2025 LHC 732

Case No: Crl. Appeal-Against Conviction-CNSA 448-23

Judgment Date: 06-03-2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Ch. Sultan Mahmood

Summary: Summary pending

THE STATE VS WASIF SAEED

Citation: 2025 LHC 773, 2025 YLR 1716

Case No: Murder Reference 2561325.208-21

Judgment Date: 06-03-2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Sardar Akbar Ali

Summary: Summary pending

SULTAN VS STATE ETC

Citation: 2025 LHC 825

Case No: Crl. Appeal-Against Conviction-PPC 328-23

Judgment Date: 06-03-2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Jawad Zafar

Summary: Autopsy and inquest report can be used to depict whether the FIR was ante-dated, with medical and criminal jurisprudence on rigor mortis being a relevant factor as well for this purpose. Effect of any conflict between medical and ocular evidence is assessed, alongwith the intrinsic value and purpose of testimony provided by court witnesses under Section 540 Cr.P.C. The court's authority to presume a fact under Article 129 of QSO and parameters of Section 103 Cr.P.C., as elucidated by a Larger Bench have also been deliberated upon.

SHAMSHAD SANNI ALIAS LALLU ETC. VS THE STATE ETC

Citation: 2025 LHC 1811

Case No: Crl. Appeal-Against Conviction-PPC 679-22

Judgment Date: 06-03-2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Sadiq Mahmud Khurram

Summary: Summary pending

NAZIA SADDIQUE VS ADJ ETC.

Citation: 2025 LHC 2078, PLJ 2025 Lahore 965

Case No: Writ Petition-Guardianship-Custody of Minor 3974-24

Judgment Date: 06-03-2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Syed Ahsan Raza Kazmi

Summary: In custody disputes, the parties' conduct is a significant factor. A mother's remarriage, however, does not ipso facto render her ineligible for custody of the minor. Writ Petition is allowed and concurrent findings of lower courts are reversed.

M/S ASTRAL CONSTRUCTION (PVT) LTD. VS PROVINCE OF PUNJAB ETC

Citation: 2025 LHC 2040

Case No: STR (Sales Tax Reference)-STR (Sales Tax Reference) 35-22

Judgment Date: 06-03-2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Asim Hafeez

Summary: Obligation of the service provider in terms of Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act, 2012.

SHAHZEB VS STATE

Citation: 2025 LHC 7370

Case No: Crl. Appeal-Against Conviction-PPC 276-23

Judgment Date: 06-03-2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Sadiq Mahmud Khurram

Summary: Summary pending

MIAN MUHAMMAD AKRAM VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC

Citation: 2025 LHC 681, 2025 PTD 860

Case No: Writ Petition-Tax and duties-Sales Tax 2420-24

Judgment Date: 06/03/2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Jawad Hassan

Summary: Summary pending

MUHAMMAD WASEEM VS THE STATE ETC

Citation: 2025 LHC 732

Case No: Crl. Appeal-Against Conviction-CNSA 448-23

Judgment Date: 06/03/2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Ch. Sultan Mahmood

Summary: Summary pending

THE STATE VS WASIF SAEED

Citation: 2025 LHC 773, 2025 YLR 1716

Case No: Murder Reference 2561325.208-21

Judgment Date: 06/03/2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Sardar Akbar Ali

Summary: Summary pending

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.05.2a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top