Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
GHULAM MUHIUDDIN VS SYED ABDUL HAKIM
Summary: Summary pending.
MUHAMMAD ALI VS SUPERINTENDENT JAIL
Summary: Summary pending.
ABDUL RAZZAK VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ KHAN VS MUHAMMAD IJAZ RASHJID
Summary: Summary pending.
HABB BANK LTD. KHANPUR Versus Mst. MUNAWAR SULTANA and another
Summary: Plj 1992 Lahore 414 [Bahawalpur Bench] Present Khalid Paul Khwaja J Hab1b Bank Ltd Khanpur - Appellant Versus Mst Munawar Sultana and another - Respondents Fao Nol3BWP of 1991 dismissed on 421992 (i) Limitation Act 1908 (lX of 190fy - S5 - - Prosecution of appeal in wrong forum - Return of appeal - Delay in filing of appeal in proper forum - Condonation of - Prayer for - Contention that appeal had been instituted in wrong forum due to mistaken advice of learned counsel as a resultof which considerable time was wasted - Held Mistaken advice of a lawyer on basis of which proceedings are prosecuted before a wrong forum has never been considered to be a good ground for condonation of delayHeld further There is no explanation of delay of one monthafter return of plaint by District Court and appeal is liable for dismissal on this account alone - Appeal dismissed [Pp417418] Def Pld 1965 SC 690 Pld 1977 SC 102 Pld 1983 SC 3851984 Scmr 8901985 Scmr 1493 1986 Scmr1093 and Pld 1991 SC 957 re (ii) Limitation Act 1908 (lX of 190 - S14 - - Prosecution of appeal in wrong forum - Return - of appeal - Delay in filing of appeal before proper forum --- Whether time spent in prosecuting appeal in wrong forum could be excluded - Question of - Value of suit for purposes of Court - fee and jurisdiction was more lhan five lacs of rupees - Appeal could only be instituted in High Court as it was beyond pecuniary jurisdiction of District Court - Appeal remained pending in District Court for about four years when it was returned instead of permitting to be withdrawn - Appeal had been filed in District Court due to carelessness and negligence and such act is never considered to be an act done in good faith - Held Appellant is not entitled to any concession under Section 14 of Limitation Act [Pp416417] Abc Mr M Shamsher Iqbal Cluigitai Advocate for AppellantJudgement Result:Appeal dismissed.
JEHANA OTHERSS VS CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF PUNJAB LAHORE
Summary: Summary pending.
SHAHBAZ VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
ABDUL GHAFFAR VS NOOR REHMAN
Summary: Summary pending.
MUHAMMAD MEHRBAN VS SADDAR DIN
Summary: Summary pending.
ABBAS RAZAPETILIONER VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.