Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

MRS GHAZALA PARVEEN VS SADIQ DANIEL

Citation: 2012 YLR 1651

Case No: CRAS Nos. 144 145/2009 AND 48/2010

Judgment Date: 08-12-2011

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi

Summary: Summary pending.

SHER HAKEEM VS THE STATE

Citation: 2012 PCrLJ 959

Case No: C.A No. 770/2010

Judgment Date: 08-12-2011

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice Fazal

Summary: Summary pending.

COCA COLA BEVERAGES PAKISTAN LTDGUJRANWALA VS COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX GUJRANWALA

Citation: 2012 PTCL 475

Case No: STA No. 2124/LB/09 STA No. 2I27/LB/09 & STA No. 2125/LB/09

Judgment Date: 08-12-2011

Jurisdiction: Board of Revenue

Judge: Justice Syed Nadeem Saqlain

Summary: Summary pending.

AMER BAKHT AZAM THROUGH ATTORNEY VS COOPERATIVE MODEL TOWN SOCIETY LTD

Citation: PLD 2012 Lahore 329, PLD 2012 LHC 329

Case No: INTRA-COURT APPEAL No. 216/2007

Judgment Date: 08-12-2011

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Nasir Saeed Sheikh

Summary: Summary pending.

ABDUL QAYYUM VS THE STATE MUHAMMAD KHALID

Citation: 2012 SD 785

Case No: CR. M. No. 2485-B/2011/BWP

Judgment Date: 08-12-2011

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Sardar Muhammad Shamim Khan

Summary: Summary pending.

MUHAMMAD AKBAR IH VS I VMST SURAYA BEGUM

Citation: 2014 MLD 1080

Case No: CR No. 403/2011

Judgment Date: 08-12-2011

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice Qaiser Rashid Khan

Summary: Summary pending.

ABDUL QAYYUM VS THE STATE

Citation: 2013 YLR 541

Case No: CrM No. 2485-B/2011/BWP

Judgment Date: 08-12-2011

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Sardar Muhammad Shamim Khan

Summary: Summary pending.

AMANULLAH KHAN VS DISTRICT JUDGE and 3 other

Citation: 2011 LHC 4008, 2012 CLC 679

Case No: Writ Petition No.25494 of 2011

Judgment Date: 08/12/2011

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Malik Shahzad Ahmad Khan

Summary: (a) West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)-------S. 5, Sched., Ss.13 & 14---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Suit for recovery of maintenance allowance---Execution of decree---Suit for recovery ofmaintenance allowance filed by the plaintiff having finally been decreed, plaintiffs filedexecution petition, which was allowed---Execution proceedings remained pending for aconsiderable period due to delaying tactics of the judgment-debtor---Petitioner, who wasfather of the judgment-debtor stood surety for payment of decretal amount---Petitionerpaid Rs.10,000 and undertook to pay the remaining decretal amount in case of nonpayment by the judgment-debtor---Later on decretal amount having not been paid by thejudgment-debtor or the petitioner/surety, judgment-debtor was finally arrested---Application filed by the petitioner/surety for discharge of his surety, had been dismissedby the Family Court and Appellate Court---Validity---Petitioner's contention was that ashe himself was not judgment-debtor and was merely a surety of judgment-debtor, onarrest of judgment-debtor, no further action could be taken against him, when he hadperformed his duty by producing the judgment-debtor before the court---Contention ofthe petitioner was misconceived as petitioner did not stand surety for appearance ofjudgment-debtor, but he stood surety for the payment of decretal amount---Petitioner,could not be absolved of his liability on account of arrest of judgment-debtor---Action forrecovery of decretal amount could validly be taken against petitioner/surety---Nointerference was required by High Court in impugned orders passed by the FamilyCourt and Appellate Court below---Petition was dismissed.Nawazo v. The State 2004 SCMR 563; Ghulam Qadir Siyal v. The State 1997 PCr.LJ554 and Mst. Maqsooda Mai v. Bukhat Ali and another 2007 MLD 1264 distinguished.(b) West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)-------S. 14(3)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Appeal againstinterim order---Petitioner in his constitutional petition had challenged an interim order ofExecuting Court---When the legislation had specifically prohibited the filing of appeal orrevision against an interim order, filing of constitutional petition against such orderwould amount to defeating and diverting the intent of the legislature---Constitutionalpetition was dismissed. Syed Saghir Ahmad Naqvi v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary S&GAD,Karachi and others 1996 SCMR 1165; Muhammad Sabir v. Mst. Azra Bibi and 2 others2011 CLC 417 and Muhammad Irfan v. Judge, Family Court, Sargodha and 2 others2008 CLC 582 rel.

MUHAMMAD ASLAM VS AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU KASHMIR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY TO AZAD GOVT MUZAFFARABAD

Citation: 2012 CLD 675

Case No: WP No. 1208/2011

Judgment Date: 07-12-2011

Jurisdiction: AJK High Court

Judge: Justice Ghulam Mustafa Mughal

Summary: Summary pending.

MUHAMMAD ASLAM VS AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU KASHMIR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY TO AZAD GOVT MUZAFFARABAD

Citation: 2012 CLD 675

Case No: WP No. 1208/2011

Judgment Date: 07-12-2011

Jurisdiction: AJK High Court

Judge: Justice Ghulam Mustafa Mughal

Summary: Summary pending.

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.05.2a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top