Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

SIRAJ S VS THE STATE

Citation: 2013 PCrLJ 398

Case No: M. A. No. 747/2012 IN C.A No. S-40/2012

Judgment Date: 14-06-2012

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti

Summary: Summary pending.

AZAD GOVT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU KASHMIR THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY MUZAFFARABAD VS MAHBOOB ASLAM KHAN

Citation: 2013 PSC 518

Case No: CIVIL APPEAL No. 117/2010

Judgment Date: 14-06-2012

Jurisdiction: AJK Supreme Court

Judge: Justice Mohammad Azam Khan

Summary: Summary pending.

Suo Moto Action regarding allegation of Business Deal between Malik Riaz Hussain & Dr. Arsalaan Iftikhar attempting to influence the judicial process.

Citation: PLD 2012 SC 664, 2012 SCP 42

Case No: S.M.C.5/2012

Judgment Date: 14/06/2012

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja

Summary: Role of Media --- The media's ethical and legal framework, requiring fairness and objectivity, is emphasized. Journalists are criticized for not conducting due diligence before reporting news of significant importance, leading to the spread of rumors and insinuations. Statements from media persons, including Mir Ibrahim Rehman, Chief Executive of Geo Network, and Kamran Khan, are scrutinized for lacking thorough checks and contributing to a damaging media onslaught on the judiciary.The document points out the absence of professional thoroughness and due diligence in media reporting, citing examples of incomplete evidence and lack of verification in the alleged bribery case involving Malik Riaz.--- The Suo Moto case initiated on June 6, 2012, in response to talk shows implicating individuals in illegal acts, casting doubt on the judiciary's independence. Media personalities like Kamran Khan and Hamid Mir reported on alleged misconduct by Dr. Arsalan Iftikhar, son of the Chief Justice, involving blackmail and financial improprieties. --- Concerns are raised about media ethics and responsibility. Media coverage, driven by baseless allegations, led to public apprehension about the judiciary's integrity. The Court critiques journalists for lack of due diligence, emphasizing the need for fairness and objectivity in reporting. --- The Court, while not making a final judgment on guilt, concludes that the judiciary's integrity remains intact. Malik Riaz's admission that no favors were granted dispels doubts cast on the Court. The case highlights the importance of due diligence in media reporting and the need for discretion in private and public dealings, especially for family members of public functionaries. the Court urged the Attorney General to pursue legal action against individuals involved in any illegal acts, emphasizing the rule of law. The judgment concludes with hope for a brighter future and quotes from the poet Hafez, underlining the significance of justice and equality before the law.

SARDARAN BIBI vs MUHAMMAD ARSHAD and others

Citation: 2022 CLC 1703

Case No: Civil Revision No.170-D/2011

Judgment Date: 13/06/2012

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Anwaar Hussain, J

Summary: Summary pending

MUHAMMAD JAMEEL VS NASEER AHMAD BHUTTA

Citation: 2012 CLC 1973

Case No: WP No. 1484/2012

Judgment Date: 13-06-2012

Jurisdiction: Islamabad High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Azim Khan Afridi

Summary: Summary pending.

MUHAMMAD JAMEEL VS NASEER AHMAD BHUTTA

Citation: 2012 CLC 1973

Case No: WP No. 1484/2012

Judgment Date: 13-06-2012

Jurisdiction: Islamabad High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Azim Khan Afridi

Summary: Summary pending.

NOOR MUHAMMAD ARID VS MST AZMAT E BIBI

Citation: 2012 SCMR 1373

Case No: CIVIL APPEAL No. 122-L/2012

Judgment Date: 13-06-2012

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani

Summary: Summary pending.

ABD UR RAZAK ALIAS KARO VS A ITHE STATE

Citation: 2012 MLD 1656

Case No: CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION No. SR342/2012

Judgment Date: 13-06-2012

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti

Summary: Summary pending.

HAMEED VS THE STATE

Citation: 2012 YLR 2804

Case No: CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION No. S-331/2012

Judgment Date: 13-06-2012

Jurisdiction: SINDH

Judge: Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatri

Summary: Summary pending.

MUHAMMAD NAZEER VS THE STATE

Citation: 2012 YLR 2797

Case No: CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATIONS Nos. S-129 AND S-130/2012

Judgment Date: 13-06-2012

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice Sadiq Hussain Bhatti

Summary: Summary pending.

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.05.2a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top