Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: S.302,34 PPCEvidence of dogs tracking,DNA test doubtful,contradiction in prosecution case,benefit of doubt(Acquitted)

Summary: Background:These related writ petitions involve Syed Sibtul Hassan Sabzwari and Dilpazeer Ahmed, both employed as Sub Engineers in the Multi Sector Rehabilitation & Improvement Project (MSR & IP) under the Works and Communication Department of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. The petitioners sought regularization of their contractual employment, challenging the procedure and decisions regarding their employment status and the advertisement of similar positions for regular employment.----Issues:Whether the petitioners should be regularized based on their contract employment in comparison to similar cases of regularization in other departments.The validity of the termination notices issued to the petitioners and the procedural adherence in the advertisement of positions they contested.----Holding/Reasoning/Outcome:Justice M. Tabassum Aftab Alvi dismissed both writ petitions. The court held that the petitioners were initially hired on a contractual basis with explicit terms that did not promise subsequent regularization. The petitioners' claims were compared against established procedures and rulings that stipulate all civil service positions must be filled based on merit through a transparent and competitive process. The court emphasized that contract employees do not automatically have the right to be regularized, especially when their initial employment terms do not stipulate such an outcome.The court also referenced multiple decisions from higher courts underscoring that employment regularization must adhere strictly to the law, preventing any bypass through executive or ad-hoc decisions. The dismissal was based on the principles that the petitioners' contract terms were clear and that their services concluded with the project's completion. The requests for regularization were found inconsistent with legal precedents that demand filling such positions through proper competitive procedures.----Citations/Precedents:Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act, 1976 and Rules, 1977Several Supreme Court precedents on employment and regularization within civil service, highlighting the importance of merit and competition in public service appointments.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.