Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
MUHAMMAD MADNI and 11 otherss vs PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Officer Revenue Lodhran and another
Summary: Summary pending
Tahir Mehmood Inspector of Police (Investigation) V. The State through Prosecutor-General, Balochistan,
Summary: Acquittal ---- Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947)-------S. 5---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 161---Illegal gratification---Appreciation of evidence---Trap raid case---Judicial Magistrate, absence of---Non-hearing of conversation---Accusedpersons were convicted and sentenced by Trial Court for accepting illegal gratification---Validity---Trap raid was made in absence of Judicial Magistrate, therefore, violative of law anddoubtful but non-associating Judicial Magistrate in trap raid did not vitiate all proceedings, as itwas not a mandatory requirement---Present was a case of illegal gratification received by publicservant with further allegation in rebuttal against three public servants to involve accused incommission of offence---Keeping in view the nature of case, some specific evidence wasrequired to establish charge---Contradictions in statements of eye-witnesses destroyed case ofprosecution---Trial Court failed to consider evidence in its true perspective and also failed todilate upon contradictions appearing in statements of witnesses, which had made evidence as lessreliable---None of witnesses heard conversation between accused and complainant, nor had seenexchange of money---Fact of recovery of tainted money from accused was also not free fromdoubts---Prosecution was required to discharge burden to prove that there was demand and acceptance of illegal gratification by public servant but failed which made it a case of acquittal---High Court set aside conviction and sentence awarded to accused by Trial Court and he wasacquitted of the charge---Appeal was allowed in circumstances.Liaquat Ali v. The State 1999 PCr.LJ 1974; Muhammad Anwar v. The State 1984 PCr.LJ1399 and Dewan v. The State 1994 PCr.LJ 2302 ref.
DILNAWAZ BEGUM OTHERSS VS MUHAMMAD AKBAR KHAN AFRIDI
Summary: Summary pending.
MENDI KHAN VS INAYAT ALI
Summary: Summary pending.
SUCCESS INDUSTRIES PVT LTD VS THE REGISTRAR SECP
Summary: Summary pending.
SABIR ALI VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
BANNUO MAI VS MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN
Summary: Summary pending.
ALLAH DITTO VS MUHAMMAD ISHAQ
Summary: Summary pending.
CIVIL PETITION NO K OF
Summary: Summary pending.
Banno Mai vs Muhammad Hussain
Summary: S.13 Pre-emption Act:Requirements of Talabs (Talb-e-muwathibat)