Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
NAEEM KHAN VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
Haji Zabta Khan vs Dr.Ahmad Ali Siraj
Summary: S.5,14 Limitation Act,S.18 WP Civil Court Ord:Recovery suit--proceedings before wrong forum--exclusion of time of proceedings in court without jurisdiction--scope,appeal--limitation
NAZIR AHMAD BHATTI and others vs M YOUNAS and others
Summary: Summary pending
SARFRAZ ALI SANGI VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
AKHLAQUE KHAN VS MUHAMMAD JAVAID SHAIKH
Summary: Summary pending.
MIRZA AFZAL BAIG VS MUDABBIR ALI KHAN
Summary: Summary pending.
MS SALMA MOOSAJEE VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Summary: Summary pending.
ATHER NAEEM ALIAS WAQAS CHAUDHARY VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
MST BAKHT SABA SI VS M THE STATE THROUGH ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL
Summary: Summary pending.
KARAM ELAHI Versus Mst. ZAITOON BIBI and 19 others
Summary: PLJ 2013 Lahore 24 [Rawalpindi Bench Rawalpindi] Present Rauf Ahmad Sheikh J KARAM ELAHI - - Petitioner versus Mst ZAITOON BIBI and 19 others - - Respondents CR No 337 - D of 2012 decided on 2342012 Civil Procedure Code 1908 (V of 1908) - - - - - - Ss 97 115 - - Civil revision - - Suit for partition of property - - Preliminary decree - - Local commission had not performed his duties in accordance with order - - Question of - - Whether petitioner had infact made statement about mode of partition proposed in report of local commission - - Validity - - If party to suit for partition did not assail preliminary decree then he cannot contend that property was not divisible or shares as determined in preliminary decrees were to correct or private partition had already taken place in view of provisions of S 97 CPC - - All the parties in attendance including petitionerh ad put their signatures or thumb impressions - - Petitioner had agreed to give passage in exchange of passage - - Such made was not assailed by any one except petitioner - - Parties were litigating against each other for last 16 years - - Mode of partition as approved by trial Court and upheld by appellate Court was equitable - - Concurrent findings recorded by Courts of competent jurisdiction did not call for any interference in exercise of revisional jurisdiction - - Petition was dismissed [Pp 25 26] A B Mr Khalid Mahmood Shahzaib Awan Advocate for PetitionerJudgement Result:Petition dismissed