Summary: (a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908): ---O. XIV, R. 1 & 2---Framing and settlement of issues---Duty of Trial Court---Scope---It is the primary duty of the trial court to frame and resolve issues based on the evidence and material on record. Failure to properly settle and resolve issues framed in a suit constitutes a material irregularity, affecting the fairness of the adjudication process. In the present case, the trial court framed twelve (12) issues but failed to resolve them based on the evidence produced by both parties, leading to a miscarriage of justice. (b) Land Laws---Ownership and Possession---Rights of Possession without Title---Scope: The petitioner, despite admitting that the suit land belonged to the Provincial Government, filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction based on possession. The trial court initially protected the petitioner's possession but restricted any further improvements on the land. However, the appellate court and revisional court set aside the protection of possession, directing the District Collector to vacate the property under the Natore Rules. (c) Administration of Justice: ---Remand of cases---When a trial court fails to resolve or settle framed issues on the basis of evidence and material on record, higher courts have the authority to remand the case for fresh adjudication. The remand aims to ensure a fair trial and adjudication based on merit without being influenced by prior observations of the trial, appellate, or revisional courts. ----Disposition: The case was remanded to the trial court for fresh adjudication within three (3) months, with directions to decide the matter on its own merits without being influenced by prior observations of the courts. The status quo is to be maintained until the trial court takes cognizance.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: It is well settled principal of law that there is double presumption of innocence in favour of acquitted accused. The learned trial court while recording the order of acquittal has properly appraised and appreciated the evidence in its true perspective, therefore, while adopting peculiar circumstances. The appeal is dismissed in limine.

Summary: Summary pending

Summary: Summary pending

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.