Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

Commissioner In-Land Revenue VS M/s Chicago Metal Works etc

Citation: 2015 LHC 2276, 2015 PTD 1913

Case No: Tax Reference No. 48 of 2011

Judgment Date: 09/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Mr. Justice Shahid Jamil Khan

Summary: Application for refund under Section 170(4) is obligatory. Refund does not become due on the date of order under Section 120 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 for calculating additional payment of delayed refund.

TATA Textile Mills Ltd. VS Collector of Custom

Citation: 2015 LHC 693, 2015 PCTLR 373

Case No: Custom Reference No.01 of 1996

Judgment Date: 09/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Mr. Justice Shahid Karim

Summary: The case revolved around the importation of textile machinery by the applicant, with 26 cases of machinery being destroyed in a fire before they could be placed in a Customs Bonded Warehouse. The applicant claimed these damaged goods had "no commercial value" and filed an ex-bond bill of entry for clearance. However, a show cause notice was issued to the applicant for violating several provisions of the Customs Act, including failure to remove the 26 damaged cases within the prescribed time. The Collector of Customs ordered the applicant to pay customs duty and sales tax with surcharge. The applicant appealed the decision to various authorities, including the Appellate Tribunal. In 1999, a Constitutional petition was filed, and the matter was ultimately decided in favor of the applicant. The court held that the applicant was entitled to the benefit of Section 108 of the Customs Act, which allowed for the appraisal and reduction of customs duty on damaged goods entered for warehousing. The judgment was reported in PLD 2000 Lahore 286. Subsequently, a civil appeal was filed in the Supreme Court, which remanded the case back to the Lahore High Court, instructing it to dispose of the reference application expediently. The court referred to its previous judgment (PLD 2000 Lahore 286) and found that the applicant was indeed entitled to the benefit of Section 108 of the Customs Act, as the damaged goods had been entered for warehousing and had not been cleared for home consumption. The court cited several other cases supporting this interpretation of the law. As a result, the reference application was accepted, and the orders of the lower forums were modified in favor of the applicant.

The State Versus Bilal Ahmedothers

Citation: Pending

Case No: No. 01/2015

Judgment Date: 09/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Supreme Appellate Court - GB

Judge: Justice

Summary: Summary Pending

HABIB BANK LIMITED vs COMMON TRADERS (PVT) LIMITED and others

Citation: 2022 CLD 229

Case No: E.F.A. No. 1163/2014

Judgment Date: 08/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Ayesha A. Malik and Shams Mehmood Mirza, JJ

Summary: Summary pending

FEROZ ALI GABA vs KARACHI FISHERIES HARBOUR AUTHORITY and 2 others

Citation: 2020 YLR 1993

Case No: H.C.As. Nos. 236 and 237/2014

Judgment Date: 08/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Irfan Saadat Khan and Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui, JJ

Summary: Summary pending

FEROZ ALI GABA vs KARACHI FISHERIES HARBOUR AUTHORITY and 2 others

Citation: 2020 YLR 1993

Case No: H.C.As. Nos. 236 and 237/2014

Judgment Date: 08/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Irfan Saadat Khan and Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui, JJ

Summary: Summary pending

Hamida Farhat Barki VS CDA

Citation: 2015 MLD 845

Case No: Writ Petition-3074-2011

Judgment Date: 8/2/2015

Jurisdiction: Islamabad High Court

Judge: Justice Aamer Farooq

Summary: Summary Pending

AMJAD HUSSAIN vs NAZIR AHMAD and others CMA No 3610 of 2022 in CRP No NIL of 2022 in CA No1256 of 2014 and CMA No 3611 of 2022 in CRP No NIL/2022 in

Citation: PLD 2023 Supreme Court 22

Case No: C.A. No.1257/2014

Judgment Date: 07/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and Ayesha A. Malik, JJ

Summary: Summary pending

BANK ALFALAH LIMITED vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Division and 4 others

Citation: 2020 PTD 827

Case No: C.P. No.D-5165/2014

Judgment Date: 07/02/2015

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Irfan Saadat Khan and Fahim Ahmed Siddiqui, JJ

Summary: Summary pending

vs FEDERAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY through Director General and 3 others Constitutional Petition NoD4002 of 2013 decided on 6th February 2015

Citation: PLD 2018 Sindh 1

Case No: Case78076

Judgment Date: 6/2/2015

Jurisdiction: Unknown

Judge: Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh and Syed Mohammad Farooq Shah, JJ

Summary: Summary pending

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.05.2a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top