Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

Jan Muhammad v. The Member (Cononies)Board of Revenue Punjab, Lahore, etc

Citation: 2017 SCMR 93, 2016 SCP 153

Case No: C.P.L.A.928-L/2015

Judgment Date: 20/10/2016

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB

Summary: All allottees under the 'Grow More Food Scheme' launched by the Board of Revenue of the then West Pakistan were to be conferred proprietary rights, provided that they had fulfilled the terms and conditions on which temporary leases were granted----The case revolves around the allocation of land under the 'Grow More Food Scheme' and subsequent legal disputes over proprietary rights and land allotments. The petitioner was initially allotted land under a temporary lease in 1957, which expired in 1962, and the land reverted to the State. However, the petitioner applied for alternate land in 1984 and was granted proprietary rights in another piece of land in 1986. The respondent contested this allocation, claiming eligibility for proprietary rights themselves. Legal precedents and notifications issued in 1958, 1962, 1970, and 1971 outline conditions for granting proprietary rights and alternate land to lessees under the scheme. These notifications stipulate that lessees fulfilling certain terms and conditions, such as cultivation and dispossession circumstances, are entitled to proprietary rights or alternate land. The respondent filed applications and petitions seeking cancellation of the petitioner's allotment and restoration of their rights. The Board of Revenue ultimately declared the petitioner's allotment as ultra vires and restored the allotment in favor of the respondent, alleging fraud and misrepresentation by the petitioner. The petitioner challenged this decision in the Lahore High Court, which upheld the cancellation of the petitioner's allotment. However, the court did not thoroughly examine the case's applicability to the legal notifications and precedents. In response, the appellate court set aside the High Court's judgment and remanded the case back to the Board of Revenue for reevaluation. The Board of Revenue is directed to determine whether the petitioner or the respondent is entitled to alternate land or if the land rightfully reverted back to the State, considering the conditions outlined in the relevant notifications.

TAHIR RIZWAN vs FIRST PUNJAB MODARABA through Branch Manager and 3 others

Citation: 2017 CLD 1752

Case No: Execution First Appeal No. 2510/2015

Judgment Date: 19/10/2016

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Abid Aziz Sheikh and Tariq Saleem Sheikh, JJ

Summary: Summary pending

SAJID HUSSAIN vs PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORTION and 3 others Respondents

Citation: 2023 CLC 1795

Case No: Suit No.855/2015

Judgment Date: 19/10/2016

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, J

Summary: Summary pending

MUHAMMAD KHALID QURESHI VS PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY EXCISE TAXATION DEPARTMENT LAHORE

Citation: 2017 CLC 523

Case No: WP No. 26223/2014

Judgment Date: 19-10-2016

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Sajid Mehmood Sethi

Summary: Summary pending.

GHAZI KHAN OTHERSS VS AZIZ UR REHMAN

Citation: 2017 CLC 366

Case No: CR No. 206-A/2012

Judgment Date: 19-10-2016

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Ghazanfar Khan

Summary: Summary pending.

HALEEM OTHERSS VS THE STATE

Citation: 2017 SCMR 709

Case No: C.AS Nos. 192 TO 194/2014 AND 110/2015

Judgment Date: 19-10-2016

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Justice

Summary: Summary pending.

R ON THE APPLICATION OF INGENIOUS MEDIA HOLDINGS PLC VS COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTYS REVENUE CUSTOMS

Citation: 2017 SCMR 63

Case No: ON APPEAL FROM: [2015] EWCA CIV 173

Judgment Date: 19-10-2016

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of UK

Judge: Justice

Summary: Summary pending.

SHOUKAT RASHEED OTHERSS VS THE STATE THROUGH NAB

Citation: 2017 PCrLJ 696

Case No: CRIMINAL REV. Nos. 16 AND 17/2016

Judgment Date: 19-10-2016

Jurisdiction: Chief Court Gilgit-Baltistan

Judge: Justice Sahib Khan

Summary: Summary pending.

MUHAMMAD HASHIM VS THE STATE

Citation: 2017 PCrLJ 409

Case No: C.AS Nos. 187 AND 194/2016

Judgment Date: 19-10-2016

Jurisdiction: Balochistan High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar

Summary: Summary pending.

THE STATE VS SHABRANG

Citation: 2017 PCrLJ 703

Case No: C.A No. 33/2016

Judgment Date: 19-10-2016

Jurisdiction: Chief Court Gilgit-Baltistan

Judge: Justice Malik Haq Nawaz

Summary: Summary pending.

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.05.2a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top