Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
Syed Asghar Shah Vs PHC Registrar
Summary: Pending
MUHAMMAD KASHIF and another vs The STATE
Summary: Summary pending
Haroon Rashid VS Federation of Pakistan
Summary: Summary Pending
Abdul Kareem V. Sultan Badshah,
Summary: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)-------O. XIII, R. 2 & O. XXXVII, R. 2---Suit for recovery of money---Additional evidence,production of---Principle---Petitioner/defendant was aggrieved of permission granted underO. XIII, R. 2, C.P.C. by Trial Court to respondent/plaintiff to place on record certaindocument---Validity---Object of O. XIII, R. 2, C.P.C. was to exclude forged document andexpedite trial and not to exclude genuine document---If there was no doubt as regards toauthenticity then for substantial justice such document was not to be refused to be received inevidence merely on the ground of delay---Trial Court was empowered under O. XIII, R. 2,C.P.C. to allow production of document at later stage, if the document was essential for justdecision of the case and also the document was free from any suspicion of being forged andfabricated---High Court declined to interfere in order passed by Trial Court---Revision wasdismissed, in circumstances.
Firdous Ali VS Abbas Ali
Summary: Background:The petitioner, Firdous Ali, filed a civil revision petition challenging the judgment/order dated 05/06/2018 passed by the learned Additional District Judge Nagar in C.F.A No. 4/2018. This order set aside the judgment/order dated 13/03/2018 passed by the learned Civil Judge 1st Class Nagar and allowed the application under Order 23 Rule 2 CPC filed by the respondents/plaintiffs for conditional withdrawal of Civil Suit No. 43/2017.----Issues:Whether the appellate court's decision to allow the withdrawal of the civil suit was legal and justified.Whether there were sufficient grounds for the conditional withdrawal of the suit.----Holding/Reasoning/Outcome:The court reviewed the submissions made by both parties and examined the record. It noted that the respondents/plaintiffs had filed an application under Order 23 Rule 2 CPC for conditional withdrawal of their suit, stating that they had filed an application regarding compensation before the Collector Nagar and did not want to proceed with the suit until that application was disposed of. The court found that this constituted a sufficient ground for conditional withdrawal of the suit, as the court cannot compel the plaintiffs to continue with the suit when there are pending matters related to the subject matter of the suit. Therefore, the court concluded that there was no error of law or fact in the impugned judgment/order passed by the appellate court, and the revision petition was accordingly dismissed.----Citations/Precedents:Civil Procedure Code (CPC), particularly Order 23 Rule 2
vs THE STATE and another Criminal Appeal No11P/2017 and Jail Petition No726 of 2017 decided on 2nd May 2019
Summary: Summary pending
Miss NUSRAT YASMIN vs REGISTRAR PESHAWAR HIGH COURT PESHAWAR and others Criminal Appeal No3P of 2017 decided on 2nd May 2019
Summary: Summary pending
MUHAMMAD NADEEM SOHAIL vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Summary: Summary pending
vs Ch ASGHAR ALI FAO No242 of 2010 heard on 2nd May 2019
Summary: Summary pending
SHAMEER vs The STATE and others
Summary: Summary pending