Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
PAKISTAN FLOUR MILLS ASSOCIATION VS THE GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Summary: Summary pending.
PAKISTAN FLOUR MILLS ASSOCIATION IN CP NO KOF MS MATIARI SUGAR MILLS LTD IN CP NO K OF VS THE GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Summary: Summary pending.
CH MUHAMMAD ANWAR VS SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE INVESTIGATING CELL LAHORE
Summary: Summary pending.
CHAIRMAN BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE SECONDARY EDUCATION BAHAWALPUR VS RIZWAN RASHID
Summary: Summary pending.
ABDUL RASHID Versus BARKATULLAH and 18 others
Summary: PLJ 2002 SC (AJK) 1 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present MUHAMMAD YUNUS SURAKHVI AND KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD SAEED JJ ABDUL RASHID - Appellant versus BARKATULLAH and 18 others - Respondents CA No 187 of 2000 decided on 1852001 (On appeal from the judgment of the High Court dated 2992000 in Civil Appeal No 291999) (i) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Prior Purchase Act - - _s 12 - - Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882) Ss 53 - A 54 - - Suit for preemption on basis of agreement to sell - Prayer for possession not included in suit for pre - emption Effect - Contents of document in questionindicated that vendors in order to evade stamp duly or to defeat prior right of purchase of respondents styled said document as agreement to sell whereas the same was in fact sale for all intents and purposes - Plaintiff however was not entitled to he granted decree for pre - emption for the reason that he never made prayer for seeking possession of land in question on the basis of prior right of purchase - Grant of decree for preemption in favour of plaintiff without seeking prayer for possession would he inexecutable in the eye of law - Judgment and decree granted in favour of plaintiff was set aside on he ground that he had not included prayer for possession of land in question [Pp 4 6] A C (ii) Civil Procedure Code 1908 (V of 1908) - - S 2 - In - exeutable decreeDecree which by itself is inexecutable even if passed is nullity and non - existent in the eye of law [P 6] B (iii) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Supreme Court Rules - OXLIII R 5 - Powers of Supreme Court - Extent - Supreme Court is vested with wide powers to make such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of process of Court [P 6] D PLD 1968 SC 342 PLD 1951 Lah 321 ref Kh Muhammad Nasim Advocate for Appellant Sh Abdul Aziz Advocate for Respondent No 1
MST JANNAT THROUGH ALLAH DITTA OTHERSS VS IKHUDA BAKHSFR THROUGH ILAHI BAKHSH
Summary: Summary pending.
KISHWAR BANOO OTHERSS VS METROPOLITAN CORPORATION LAHORETHROUGH ADMINISTRATOR
Summary: Summary pending.
ABDUL JABBAR OTHERSS VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
NOOR JEHAN BI VS MUHAMMAD YOUSAF
Summary: Summary pending.
MESSRS NAWABSONS LABORATORIES PVT LIMITED T THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR VS GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB HEALTH DEPARTMENT THROUGH SECRETARY CIVIL SECRETARIAT LAHORE
Summary: Summary pending.