Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
FARZANA RASOOL THREE VS DR MUHAMMAD BASHIR
Summary: Summary pending.
GROUP CAPTAIN SYED MUHAMMAD FAZAL VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARYMINISTRY OF DEFENCE RAWALPINDI CANTT
Summary: Summary pending.
ALI HASSAN ALIAS SIKAR VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
MS PERVAIZ UMER VS THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AFU ENTERPRISES CUSTOMS ALLAMA IQBAL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LAHORECLEARING AGENTS LAHORE
Summary: Summary pending.
DEUTSCHE BANK AGPlaintiff vs FATEH TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED
Summary: Summary pending
KHADIM HUSSAIN VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
FAIZULLAH KHAN ETC VS HAJI ABDUL HAKEEM KHAN
Summary: Summary pending.
ABDUL HAMEED VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
MUHAMMAD RAMZAN VS MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN
Summary: Suit for pre-emption--Determination and deposit of decretalamount---Trial Court decreed the suit but did not mention anything about the deposit of decretalamount---On filing application by the plaintiff/decree-holder under Ss.151/152, C.P.C. for thecorrection of the judgment and decree, Trial Court corrected same directing the decree-holder todeposit the amount which was deposited by the decree-holder accordingly--Defendant/judgment-debtor's petition against the order of the Trial Court, court directed the decree-holderfor further deposit of amount which was deposited accordingly---Defendant/judgment-debtorfiled constitutional petition contending that after passing the judgment and decree, the TrialCourt had no jurisdiction to extend the time---Validity---Trial Court had cured the omission inaccordance with law---Trial Court was to mention a specific amount with a specific date to bedeposited, but since it was lacking in the relief granting para, plaintiff/decree-holder could notbe penalized; as act of the court would prejudice no one---In absence of any illegality,irregularity or jurisdictional defect in the orders of the courts below, same could not be interferedwith by High Court in constitutional petition.
TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KARACHI VS SAQIB SAMDANI
Summary: Summary pending.